Search Results for "Judicious mind"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Judicious mind"

447 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 447 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Secured Creditors in SARFAESI Act Case — Holds Chief Judicial Magistrate Competent Under Section 14. The Court resolved the conflict among High Courts by interpreting that the CJM can exercise powers under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, for taking possession of secured assets in non-metropolitan areas.

23 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court resolved a conflict among High Courts regarding the interpretation of Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Bail Orders in Murder Case Due to Lack of Reasoning and Non-Compliance with Judicial Directions. The High Court's cryptic bail grants without addressing offence gravity or accused's evasion of court proceedings violated established bail principles under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

18 Jan 2022

The appeals were preferred by the informant appellant, mother of the deceased Yameen, challenging the bail orders granted by the High Court of Judicat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order in Bombay Police Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Externment order under Section 56(1)(b) of Bombay Police Act, 1951 set aside as show-cause notice and order were based on stale and irrelevant incidents without considering the petitioner's explanation.

1 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Praful Bhausaheb Yadav, a cable operator by profession, filed a writ petition challenging an externment order passed under Section 56(...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — Lack of Expert Opinion and Prima Facie Evidence. Section 304(A) IPC Proceedings Set Aside as Complaint Did Not Disclose Essential Ingredients of Rash or Negligent Act Causing Death.

22 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Rajeshwari, a medical practitioner, sought quashing of the order dated 19.08.2013 passed by the JMFC-II, Raichur, in FIR No.669/20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Acquittal in SC/ST Act Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Caste-Based Insult and Hurt. Alleged Offence of Caste Abuse and Assault Not Established Beyond Reasonable Doubt; Acquittal Upheld Under Sections 3(1)(x), 3(2)(v) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 504, 506 of IPC.

27 Jun 2017

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by the original complainant, Madhav Vithal Magar, challenging the judgment and order of acq...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — Lack of Expert Opinion and Prima Facie Evidence. Section 304(A) IPC Proceedings Set Aside as Complaint Did Not Disclose Essential Ingredients of Rash or Negligent Act Causing Death.

22 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Rajeshwari, a medical practitioner, sought quashing of the order dated 19.08.2013 passed by the JMFC-II, Raichur, in FIR No.669/20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Dissenting Financial Creditor in Insolvency Resolution Process Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Approval of Resolution Plan by Committee of Creditors Based on Commercial Wisdom is Not Subject to Judicial Review on Grounds of Security Interest Value Omission, as Per Section 30(4) and Limited Scope Under Section 61(3).

13 May 2021

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the corporate debtor VSP Udyog Private Limited. The appellan...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Lokayukta Case, Upholds Statutory Power to Direct Preliminary Inquiry by State Agency. The Court Held That Section 20(1) of the Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014 Permits the Lokayukta to Order a Preliminary Inquiry by Any Agency, Including the Directorate of Vigilance, to Ascertain a Prima Facie Case, and Judicial Interference at This Stage Was Unwarranted.

23 Feb 2023

The dispute arose from a complaint dated 9th December 2020 by a Deputy Superintendent of Police alleging corruption against an elected Member of the L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitrator's findings of fact and declined to re-appreciate evidence, reaffirming the limited scope of judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Sharekhan Limited, a stock broker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Condonation of Delay by Karnataka Housing Board under Limitation Act. High Court's Order Condoning 3966-Day Delay in Filing Second Appeal is Scrutinized on Grounds of State Lethargy and Sufficient Cause.

1 Jan 1970

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka condoning a delay of 3966 days in filing a second appeal by t...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)