Search Results for "Indian Railways Act"

216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Wagon Supply Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that appellant failed to prove force majeure and that respondent was entitled to refund of advance payment with interest.

The appellant, Titagarh Wagons Limited, entered into a purchase order dated 20.02.2006 with the respondent, Chowgule and Company Private Limited, for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Union of India Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Interpretation of 'Fall Clause' in Repeat Order for Supply of PSC Sleepers Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India (Central Railway) against an order of a learned Single Judge dismissing its challenge under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railways' Petition Challenging Equal Pension to Two Widows. Railway Pension Rules Allow Payment to Multiple Widows in Equal Shares Despite Second Marriage Being Void Under Hindu Marriage Act.

The Union of India, through the General Manager of South East Central Railway, Bilaspur, and the Divisional Railway Manager, Nagpur, filed a writ peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Railway Property Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge. Possession of railway property without proof of knowledge or reason to believe it is railway property does not attract Section 3(a) of Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Bhagwat Rajaram Patil, was the owner of a rolling mill at Manyarkheda, Jalgaon. On 18 July 1999, the Railway Protection Force (RPF) co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved, No Contributory Negligence by Deceased. Deceased was a pillion rider on motorcycle hit by truck; court held that mere presence of pillion rider on motorcycle does not imply contributory negligence.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the appellants, who are the legal heirs of the deceased pillion rider. The deceased was riding as...