Search Results for "Indian Army"

301 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 301 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Examines Union's Writ Against AFT Order Allowing Disability Pension. Dispute Centers on Whether AFT Correctly Applied Dharamvir Singh Precedent to Overrule Ministry's Finding of Non-Attributability.

The Union of India filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to quash the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), Chen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Sikkim Tax Exemption Challenge. Gender-Based Proviso Denying Exemption to Sikkimese Women Marrying Non-Sikkimese Struck Down as Unconstitutional.

The judgment concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies High Powered Committee Recommendations in Chardham Highway Project Case to Balance Development and Environmental Protection. The court held that widening of highways in ecologically sensitive Himalayan region must be subject to strict environmental safeguards and monitoring.

The case concerns the Chardham Mahamarg Vikas Pariyojna, a project by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways to widen approximately 900 km of nat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Brigadier Challenging Non-Empanelment for Promotion to Major General. Selection Board's Assessment Based on Overall Reckonable Profile Within Batch Upheld as Fair and in Accordance with Army Promotion Policy.

The appellant, Brigadier Nalin Kumar Bhatia, was commissioned in the Indian Army in 1981 and promoted to Brigadier in 2008. His case for empanelment t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Grade Pay Parity for Army Officer in MES. Army Officer Cannot Claim Equal Grade Pay with Civilian Counterparts as IDSE Rules Exclude Tenure Appointments and Military Personnel Form a Distinct Class.

The appeal was filed by the Union of India against the judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Kolkata, which directed the Appellants t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Army Personnel in Habitual Absence Case — Preliminary Enquiry Requirement Satisfied. Repeated Red Ink Entries for Absence from Duty Justify Discharge Under Army Instructions, No Regular Enquiry Needed.

The appellant, Sep. Satgur Singh, was a member of the Indian Army who served for 11 years, 9 months, and 15 days. During his service, he was awarded s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Army Disciplinary Jurisdiction, Sets Aside High Court Stay on Attachment Order. High Court's Pre-emptive Intervention in Army Discipline Under Army Act 1950 and Army Instructions 30/86 Held Unwarranted as Respondent Was Posted Outside Its Territorial Jurisdiction.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Union of India and others against the interim orders of the High Court of Manipur dated 5 November 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summary Court Martial Conviction for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Evidence. Petitioner's thumb impression on payment vouchers not proved to be superimposed; conviction set aside.

The petitioner, Major Anurag Pathak, was a Company Commander in the Indian Army. During his tenure in Bhutan (1993-96), he was later called upon to re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Army Convict Challenging General Court Martial Conviction for Murder. Petitioner's life imprisonment and dismissal from service upheld as court martial proceedings were valid and no jurisdictional error found.

The petitioner, Arun Raj, an ex-serviceman of the Indian Army, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Cour...