Search Results for "Income Tax Act, 1961"

148 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 148 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case — Crude Degummed Soyabean Oil Not an Agricultural Product Under Notification No. 53/2003-Cus. Nexus Between Imported and Exported Products Established Under DFCE Scheme.

The appellant, Noble Resources and Trading India Private Limited (formerly Andagro Services Pvt. Ltd.), a government-recognized two-star export house,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Income Tax Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice and Mandatory Procedures under Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Court Emphasizes Adherence to Faceless Assessment Procedures and Audi Alteram Partem Principle in Tax Reassessment Cases

Reassessment Beyond 4 Years: Reassessment under Section 147 of the IT Act cannot be initiated beyond the 4-year period unless there is evidence of fai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 260A — Bombay High Court Dismissed Appeals by Refrigerated Distributors Pvt Ltd Challenging Additions on Bogus Purchases — No Substantial Question of Law Involved

Assessment Years 2007-08 to 2012-13 — Appellant Assessee Failed to Prove Purchases — Tribunal’s Reduction of Addition from 25% to 10% of Gross P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court held that the entire amount of unverified purchases should be disallowed under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, rejecting partial disallowance made by appellate authorities.

Income Tax Act, 1961 – Section 69C – Bogus Purchases – Profit Rate Determination – Full Disallowance – Validity of Tribunal’s Decision ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court – Income Tax – Remission of Matter to Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) – Costs Imposed on Petitioner. Failure to inform the Assessing Officer of pending objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel led to the setting aside of the assessment order with costs imposed.

The Court exercised its discretion in setting aside the assessment order due to the Petitioner’s procedural lapse, emphasizing that such indulgence ...