Search Results for "Impleading legal representatives"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Impleading legal representatives"

149 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation for Pillion Rider Death in Motor Accident Claim. Pillion Rider Cannot Be Held Contributorily Negligent for Rider's Sudden Braking; Compensation Enhanced Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

30 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a judgment and award dated 10.07.2024 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.) Mahisagar at Lunawada in M.A.C.P. No. 84 of 2...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Petitions Challenging Orders on Impleading and Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Held That Trial Court's Discretionary Orders Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Are Not Interfered With Under Article 227.

24 Feb 2026

The case involves two Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, arising from a suit for specific performanc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Civil Revision Petition in Suit Dismissal Dispute — Rejects Trial Court's Refusal to Permit Withdrawal of Suit as Not Pressed. Plaintiff's right to withdraw suit under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC upheld; mere filing of written statement or framing of issues does not bar withdrawal.

30 Jul 2025

The plaintiff, since deceased represented by her legal representatives, filed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert, and Suit Property Not Identified.

13 Sep 2023

The appellant, M/s. Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC against the judgment and decree dated 30.04.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Legal Heirs and Conversion of Probate to Letters of Administration in Testamentary Suit. The court held that the right to sue survives to legal representatives of deceased executor and that probate proceedings can be converted to letters of administration under the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

26 Jun 2023

The judgment arises from two interim applications filed by Deepika S. Panicker and others, claiming to be legal heirs of the deceased appellant Kunjum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Impleadment of Legal Representatives as Defendants in Individual Capacity in Specific Performance Suit. Order I Rule 10 CPC Allows Addition of Necessary Parties Claiming Independent Rights in Suit Property Despite Already Being on Record as LRs.

4 Dec 2018

The petitioner filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 11-11-2009 executed by the deceased defendant no.1 in respect of suit prope...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Plaintiff's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Appointment of Commissioner in Suit for Specific Performance. Court holds that appointment of commissioner for measurement of suit property is not permissible under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC when the purpose is to collect evidence for proving the case, as the commissioner's role is limited to elucidating matters already in issue.

23 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Mallappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 02.03.2015 passed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Legal Heir to Be Brought on Record in Final Decree Proceedings Without Setting Aside Abatement. Final Decree Proceedings Are Execution Proceedings; Order 22 Rules 3, 4, 8 CPC Not Applicable.

28 Feb 2018

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Anuradha Vasantrao Ghorpade, the legal heir of Vasantrao Tatyaso Ghorpade (deceased), challeng...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment of Plaint in Civil Suit for Permanent Injunction to Include Alternative Relief of Specific Performance. Pre-trial amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC should be liberally allowed if no prejudice is caused to the opposite party.

18 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Shri Bhramappa S/o Parappa Savadi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Demolition Order Under Section 95 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 — Lack of Jurisdiction as Dispute Involves Title and Possession. Tahsildar cannot exercise summary powers under Section 95 when there is a bona fide dispute regarding title and possession of land, which must be adjudicated by a Civil Court.

5 Dec 2016

The petitioner, G.S. Siddaraju, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 05.07.2016 passed by the Tahsildar, Davangere, under Section 95 of th...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)