Search Results for "IPC 121-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "IPC 121-A"

39 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in UAPA Jurisdiction Case — Sessions Court Has Power to Add UAPA Offences When No Special Court Notified by State Government. The Court held that under Section 22(3) of the NIA Act, the Sessions Court is the exclusive trial court for UAPA offences when no Special Court is constituted by the State Government, and the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate retains remand jurisdiction.

1 Jan 2024

The State of West Bengal appealed against the Calcutta High Court's order quashing proceedings under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (U...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bail to Accused in UAPA Case for Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Involvement in Terrorist Activities. The court held that mere association with PFI, not listed as a terrorist organization, and allegations of tampering with evidence do not satisfy the prima facie true test under Section 43D(5) of UAPA.

10 Aug 2023

The appellant, a retired police constable, was arrested on 12th July 2022 and charged under Sections 121, 121A, 122 IPC and Sections 13, 18, 18A, 20 o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Bail Appeal in NIA Case — Accused No.16 in Terror Conspiracy Case Denied Bail Due to Prima Facie Involvement and Flight Risk. The court held that the accused's active participation in the conspiracy and the serious nature of offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and Indian Penal Code, 1860 warranted denial of bail.

15 Jun 2023

The appellant, Zabiulla @ Zabibulla, accused No.16 in Spl.C.C.No.320/2020, filed a criminal appeal under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation A...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Remand Extension Order in UAPA Case for Lack of Jurisdiction — Magistrate Not Empowered to Extend Remand Beyond 15 Days Without Production of Accused. Default bail order set aside as premature.

21 Apr 2023

The petitioners, five individuals arrested in Crime No.71/2022 registered by Panambur Police Station for offences under Sections 121, 121A, 120B, 153A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon-Elgaar Parishad Case Under UAP Act — No Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy or Terrorist Act. Appellant's mere presence at meetings and sharing of social media posts does not constitute an offence under Sections 13, 16, 18, 20, 38, 39, 40 of UAP Act or Sections 120B, 115, 121, 121A, 124A, 153A, 505(1)(B), 34 IPC.

17 Oct 2022

The appellant, Jyoti Jagtap, was arrested as accused No. 15 in FIR No. RC-01/2020/NIA/MUM registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon-Elgar Parishad Case Under UAP Act. Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 and Entitles Accused to Bail Despite Section 43D(5) Bar.

19 Sep 2022

The appellant, Hany Babu, a professor and academic, was arrested on 28 July 2020 in connection with FIR No. 1 of 2020 registered by the National Inves...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Criminal Revision Petitions Challenging Framing of Charges in Multiple Cases. Court holds that at the stage of framing charges, only a prima facie case is required and not a detailed evaluation of evidence.

24 Mar 2017

The judgment involves a batch of criminal revision petitions filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, ch...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Waging War Against State Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Irregularities. Conviction under Sections 121, 122, 124A IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of incriminating articles and recovery was not witnessed by independent persons.

20 Jul 2016

The appellant, Abdul Raheman @ Shami Ahmed Sha, was convicted by the Fast Track Court No.I at Gulbarga in Sessions Case No.316/2006 for offences under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Police Sub-Inspector in Sohrabuddin Shaikh Fake Encounter Case — Applicant Not Named in FIR and No Overt Act Alleged. The court held that mere presence at the scene of conspiracy without any overt act does not constitute criminal conspiracy under Section 120B IPC.

10 Jul 2013

The applicant, Shyam Singh Charan, a police sub-inspector from Rajasthan, was accused no. 9 in a case registered by the CBI for the alleged abduction ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Life Convicts' Open Prison Admission Despite Robbery Convictions — Rule 4(2)(vii) of Maharashtra Open Prisons Rules, 1971 Not Applicable When Life Sentence Is Primary. The court held that convicts sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC along with lesser sentences under Sections 392-397 IPC, with concurrent sentences, are eligible for open prison after completing the lesser sentence.

12 Aug 2010

The Bombay High Court decided three criminal writ petitions raising a common issue: whether convicts sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302 ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)