Search Results for "Hypothecation Agreement"

121 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 121 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Dealer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Dealer Not Liable as Owner Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Dealership Agreement Cannot Shift Statutory Liability of Manufacturer for Third-Party Compensation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Vaibhav Jain, the proprietor of M/s Vaibhav Motors, a dealer of Hindustan Motors Pvt. Ltd. The case aros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Case for Theft of Vehicle Purchased at Auction — Insurer Cannot Repudiate Claim on Ground of Lack of Insurable Interest When Premium Was Accepted and Policy Issued Reflecting Transferee's Name.

The appellant, M/s. Balwant Singh & Sons, purchased a vehicle at an auction conducted by ICICI Bank, the hypothecatee, after the original owner (third...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Rules on Motor Vehicle Alteration Over Central Prototype Norms. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules permit structural alterations with registering authority's approval, overriding Central Motor Vehicle Rules' restriction on deviation from prototype test.

The case involved a conflict of judicial opinion in the Kerala High Court regarding the permissibility of structural alterations to motor vehicles tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Loan Dispute, Upholds Financer's Claim. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement is not a jurisdictional issue under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the award is not patently illegal.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions: Arbitration Petition No. 783 of 2011 filed by the borrowers (M/s. Sahyadri Earthmovers and its partne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favor of PepsiCo Due to Absence of Valid Arbitration Agreement. The Court Held That Without a Signed Contract Containing an Arbitration Clause, the Arbitrator Lacked Jurisdiction to Entertain the Claim.

The case involves a challenge by PepsiCo India Holding Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) against an arbitral award dated 7 January 2010 passed by a sole arbitrat...