Search Results for "Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam"

44 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Sets Aside MSME Facilitation Council Award for Lack of Jurisdiction — BSNL Not Liable for Interest Under MSMED Act as Council Had No Territorial Authority Over Dispute Arising from Contract with Chennai Seat of Arbitration.

6 Feb 2026

The petitioner, M/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes MSEFC Award for Lack of Jurisdiction Over Buyer Not Registered Under MSMED Act. Petitioner's Failure to File Objections Under Section 18(3) Does Not Confer Jurisdiction on Council When Buyer Is Not a 'Supplier' Under Section 2(n) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.

23 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Dodal Electro Instruments, a proprietorship concern based in Pune, engaged in the manufacture and supply of electrical instruments, en...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Franchise Dispute Due to Ex-Facie Time-Barred Claims. Limitation Act, 1963 applies to Section 11(6) applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the court may refuse reference where claims are hopelessly barred by limitation.

1 Mar 2024

The petitioner, M/s Arif Azim Co. Ltd., a company based in Afghanistan, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Time Limits for Awards Under Land Acquisition Laws in Appeal Against High Court Ruling on Lapse of Proceedings. The Court Examines Whether the Two-Year Period Under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Applies Post-Repeal or the Twelve-Month Period Under Section 25 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Governs Awards Under Section 24(1)(a).

10 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for the Gosikhurd Project. On 16th June 2011, a notification...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Act Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Captive Generating Plant Wheeling Power to Own Units Is a Generating Company, Not Open Access Consumer, Under Section 86(1)(f). The Court Clarifies That Section 86(1)(f) Covers Disputes Between Licensees and Generating Companies, and the Appellant's Captive Power Plant Qualifies as a Generating Company.

4 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court, which had set aside an ar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Act Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Captive Generating Plant Using Open Access to Wheel Power to Its Own Units Is a 'Generating Company' Under Section 86(1)(f). The Court Clarifies That the Term 'Generating Company' Includes a Captive Generating Plant and That Disputes Arising from Open Access Agreements for Wheeling Power to Own Units Fall Within the Arbitral Jurisdiction of the State Commission.

4 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court, which had set aside an ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint in Electricity Supply Dispute — Holds that Disputes Between Licensees Fall Within Exclusive Jurisdiction of State Electricity Regulatory Commission Under Section 86(1)(f) of Electricity Act, 2003. The court interpreted the word 'and' in Section 86(1)(f) disjunctively, covering disputes between licensees inter se, and rejected the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC as the civil suit was barred.

28 Mar 2016

The plaintiff, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL), a distribution licensee, filed a civil suit for damages against defendant...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute Over Transferable Duty Free Licence. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses and rejection of claim for damages based on alleged breach of warranty regarding transferability of advance licence.

10 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Reliance Industries Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Section 138 NI Act Case, Holding Unsigned Complaint is Curable Irregularity. Amendment to Sign Complaint Relates Back to Date of Filing, Saving Limitation.

18 Mar 2010

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from complaints filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by M/s. Reliance Indus...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Excise Licences for Non-Payment of Annual Fee. Rule 7(2) of the Maharashtra Foreign Liquor (Import, Export and Transport) Rules, 1965 mandates annual fee payment as a condition for licence validity; non-payment renders licence void without need for show cause notice.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, holders of country liquor licences under the Maharashtra Foreign Liquor (Import, Export and Transport) Rules, 1965, challenged the ca...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)