Search Results for "Greater Hardship"

571 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 571 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Case Under UP Urban Buildings Act, 1972. Prescribed Authority's finding of bona fide need and comparative hardship under Section 21(1)(a) reinstated as Appellate Authority's reversal lacked sufficient reasoning.

The appeal arose from a landlord-tenant dispute over a cinema building in Allahabad. The appellant, successor-in-interest to Murlidhar Aggarwal, sough...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Unauthorized Construction and Inaction by Municipal Corporation — Directions Issued to MCGM to Act Within Four Weeks. Resident's Locus Standi Upheld Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Sections 351, 354, 355A, 488.

The petitioner, Dr. Rahul Jain, a resident of Borivali West, Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Landlord's Bonafide Need for Eviction but Modifies Decree to Partial Eviction in Rent Control Dispute. Landlord's need for expanding business and residence due to heart ailment considered bonafide, but tenant's hardship led to eviction from only one room.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from eviction proceedings between Mohanlal Agrawal (landlord) and Navalkishor Kulwal (tenant) concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree in Tenant's Writ Petition — Bonafide Need of Landlord Established. Landlord's requirement for business expansion and settling sons held genuine under Section 16(1)(g) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the tenant (petitioner) challenging the decree for eviction passed by the appellate court under Section 34 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals, Remands Case for Fresh Assessment, Clarifies Taxability of Unauthorised Structures and Reassessment of Land. Unauthorised Structures Held Liable to Property Tax Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, While Land Already Assessed Cannot Be Reassessed.

The four first appeals before the Bombay High Court arose out of orders passed by the Small Causes Court in municipal appeals concerning the fixation ...