Search Results for "Grampanchayat Resolution"

119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gram Panchayat Member Challenging Disqualification as Gram Rojgar Sevak. Post of Gram Rojgar Sevak under MGNREGA is not an office of profit under Section 14(1)(f) or (g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Santosh Jagannath Galbe, was an elected member of the Village Panchayat, Devegaon, Parbhani, and also worked as a Gram Rojgar Sevak un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Performance Licenses for Tamasha Troupes — Violation of Natural Justice. Licenses Cancelled Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing Under Tamasha Rules, 1960.

The petitioners, Renuka Sanskritik Kala Kendra and Natraj Sanskrutik Kala Kendra, are proprietors of tamasha troupes operating in Moha, Taluka Jamkhed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Absence of Theft and Common Object. Removal of Tin Sheets from Grampanchayat Property Does Not Constitute Dacoity Under Section 395 IPC as Essential Ingredients of Theft and Dishonest Intention Are Missing.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 12th October 2001 passed by the Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No.89 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch for Interest in Contract with Gram Panchayat. Joint Ownership of Hotel Property with License from Panchayat Constitutes Interest in Contract Under Section 14(1)(j) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The Petitioner, Jijabai Tukaram Gaikwad, was elected as a member and later as Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat Takave (Budruk) in 2015. The Respondent N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Grampanchayat Dispute. Special Meeting Convened by Tahsildar Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Held Valid Despite Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petitioner, Surekha Eshwar Jadhav, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Bhatapur (PD), Taluka Mukhed, District Nanded. Respondent nos.1 to 6, who wer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Order Allowing Liquor Licence in Village Where Women's Gramsabha Resolution Banned Liquor — Held That Gramsabha Resolution Under Section 138 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Must Be Given Due Weight and Cannot Be Ignored by Revisional Authority.

The petitioners, residents of Village Chas (kaman), Taluka Khed, Dist. Pune, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of I...