Search Results for "Government Poramboke Land"

38 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 38 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Demolition of Illegal Constructions on Water Bodies in Tamil Nadu. Court Directs Removal of Encroachments and Restoration of Water Bodies to Protect Environment and Public Interest Under Public Trust Doctrine and Article 21.

This batch of writ petitions was filed by various individuals and associations challenging the demolition of constructions on water bodies and river b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Assignment Dispute — Plaintiff's Title Upheld Based on Valid Government Assignment and Possession. The court restored the trial court's decree of injunction, finding that the lower appellate court's reversal was perverse and not supported by evidence.

The plaintiff, an ex-serviceman, applied for assignment of a poramboke land in 1985. The Collector directed payment, which was made on 16/10/1985. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Challenging Encroachment Order, Directs Government to Consider Land Exchange Proposal. Petitioners' offer of alternate land in lieu of encroached Government Poramboke land pending before Government; no further adjudication required.

The petitioners, Diocese of Chingleput society and Mazhai Malai Madha Arul Thalam, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Commissioner of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Against Impleadment of Third Party in Suit for Injunction and Patta. Third Party Claiming Right of Way Over Government Poramboke Land Cannot Be Impleaded Without Individual Interest.

The petitioner filed a civil revision petition challenging the order of the Principal District Munsif Court at Gingee allowing the impleadment of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Against Impleadment of Third Party in Suit for Injunction and Patta. Third Party Claiming Right of Way Over Government Poramboke Land Cannot Be Impleaded in Individual Capacity Without Showing Individual Interest.

The petitioner filed a suit for bare injunction to restrain government officials from interfering with his possession and for a mandatory injunction d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Notice Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 — Non-Speaking Final Notice Held Valid as No Adjudication Required at Section 6 Stage. Petitioners Failed to Exhaust Statutory Appeal Remedy Under Section 10 of the Act.

The petitioners, Karupayee and Thangamani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Assignment of Burial Ground Land. Writ of Mandamus issued to District Collector to decide on petitioner's representation for assignment of government poramboke land for burial ground use.

The petitioner, M. Anwar Hussain, a resident of Thucklay Village and a member of Thiruvithancode Muslim Jamath, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Exhumation of Dead Body After 16 Years Due to Inordinate Delay. The court held that a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to compel consideration of a stale representation after such a long period, as the delay defeats the purpose of the relief sought.

The petitioner, S. Chinnadurai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Exhumation of Dead Body After 16 Years Due to Inordinate Delay. Petitioner's representation to exhume a body buried in 2009 was rejected as the court found no legal right to seek exhumation after such a long period.

The petitioner, S. Chinnadurai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court...