Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Assignment of Burial Ground Land. Writ of Mandamus issued to District Collector to decide on petitioner's representation for assignment of government poramboke land for burial ground use.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M. Anwar Hussain, a resident of Thucklay Village and a member of Thiruvithancode Muslim Jamath, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the District Collector, Kanyakumari District, to grant assignment of land in S.No.370/4 in Thakley Revenue Village, Kalkulam Taluk, for use as a burial ground by the Jamath. The petitioner had made a representation dated 30.4.2019, which was forwarded by the Commissioner of Land Administration to the District Collector via letter dated 28.5.2019. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the Jamath is one of the oldest in the district, with a mosque located in S.No.370/1, and the adjacent government poramboke land has been used as a burial ground by forefathers. The court, after hearing the Government Advocate who took notice, disposed of the petition at the admission stage by consent. The court directed the District Collector to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Consideration of Representation - Petitioner sought direction to consider representation for assignment of land as burial ground - Court held that the representation must be considered within a stipulated time frame - Held that the writ petition is disposed of with direction to consider representation within eight weeks (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the District Collector should be directed to consider the petitioner's representation for assignment of government poramboke land for use as a burial ground.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent (District Collector) to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.4.2019 and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Article 226
  • Consideration of representation
  • Assignment of government land
  • Burial ground
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:MHC:137

W.P(MD)NO.759 OF 2025

2025-01-09

N.MALA

2025:MHC:137

Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff, Mr.M.Muthumanikkam

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 226 seeking Mandamus for assignment of government land for burial ground.

Remedy Sought

Direction to the District Collector to grant assignment of land in S.No.370/4 for burial ground based on representation dated 30.4.2019.

Filing Reason

Non-consideration of representation for assignment of government poramboke land for burial ground.

Issues

Whether the District Collector should be directed to consider the petitioner's representation for assignment of land for burial ground.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel submitted that the Jamath is old and the adjacent government poramboke land has been used as burial ground by forefathers; representation was made but not decided.

Ratio Decidendi

A writ of mandamus can be issued to direct a public authority to consider a pending representation within a reasonable time, without expressing opinion on merits.

Judgment Excerpts

This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to grant assignment of land in S.No.370/4 in Thakley Revenue Village, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District in favour of the Petitioner’s Jamath for being used as a burial ground by considering the Petitioner’s representation, dated 30.4.2019 forwarded by the third respondent to the first respondent by his proceedings in Letter No.G1/9578/2019, dated 28.5.2019 within the time stipulated by this Court.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed on an unspecified date, taken up for final disposal at admission stage by consent of both parties on 09.01.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Ayurvedic Lecturers Seeking Absorption in Government Service — Post-Qualification Teaching Experience Requirement Upheld. Appellants lacked mandatory three years teaching experience at time of initial appointment,...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Gratuitous Passenger Not Covered Under Policy But Insurer Failed to Prove Breach of Conditions. The court held that the insurer must prove breach of policy conditio...