Search Results for "Error Apparent on Record"

46 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Stamp Duty Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record in Order Granting Time to Pay Deficit Stamp Duty. Review Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Ground Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC for Recall of Judgment.

The Review Petition No.340 of 2019 was filed by Seetharama Shetty (the petitioner/plaintiff) seeking recall of the judgment dated 23.08.2019 passed in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Section 114 r/w Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioners seek re-argument on merits, not correction of error.

The review petition was filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) seeking review of an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Rejects Review Petition for Lack of Error Apparent on Record. Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Ground for Review Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The petitioner, C. Sreenivasan, filed a review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking revi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition Against Consent Order Directing Deposit for Children's Education. Court holds that review is not maintainable as no error apparent on record and order was passed with consent.

The case involves a review petition filed by John Vergese (petitioner) seeking review of an order dated 5.11.2004 passed by a learned Single Judge of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Matrimonial Dispute Over Maintenance and Injunction. Court holds that review cannot be used to re-argue the merits of a case when the original order was passed with consent and no error apparent on record exists.

The case involves a review petition filed by John Vergese (the husband) against an order dated 5.11.2004 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Caste Scrutiny Case — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Court holds that review jurisdiction is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used as an appeal.

The petitioner, Umesh Narsing Jadhav, filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking review of the judgment dated 24.3.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Partition Suit — No Error Apparent on Record in Second Appeal Dismissal. Order 41 Rule 31 CPC Compliance Not Required at Admission Stage of Second Appeal.

The judgment concerns two review petitions filed by the original plaintiff, Genba Sahadu Modak (since deceased through his legal heir), against the di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Nariman Point Car Parking Project Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used as an appeal.

The petitioners, Nariman Point Association and another, filed a review petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Order 47 Rule 1 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Employment Exchange Registration Case — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review Cannot Be Used as an Appeal and Mere Change of View Not Ground for Review.

The judgment pertains to two Civil Review Applications (No. 6669/2006 and No. 6716/2006) filed by Anil s/o Bajirao Badgujar against the State of Mahar...