Search Results for "Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952"

142 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes EPF Recovery Orders Against Closed Cooperative Society — No Employees, No Liability Under EPF Act. Ginning Factory Closed Since 2003 with Disconnected Electricity Supply; Impugned Orders for Period After Closure Set Aside.

The petitioner, M/s. Utkarsha Vividha Karyakari Sahakari Society, a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows EPFO's Writ Petitions Against Educational Institution and Financial Company for Non-Compliance with Provident Fund Dues. EPF Act Sections 7A and 7B Proceedings Upheld as Proper Exercise of Quasi-Judicial Authority.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by the Central Board of Trustee, Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) against M/s. Saket Coll...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Municipal Council's Challenge to EPF Liability Determination. Review Application Under Section 7-B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Rejected as No Error Apparent on Record and Delay Not Explained.

The petitioner, Municipal Council, Dhamangaon, a civic body established in 1945 and governed by the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Provident Fund Damages for Delayed Remittance. Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Imposes Strict Liability Without Requiring Mens Rea.

The petitioner, M/s HMT Limited, a Central Public Sector Enterprise, challenged the order dated 2.1.2004 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Damages Under Section 14-B of EPF Act for Delayed Contributions. Levy of Damages Under Section 14-B Does Not Require Mens Rea and Is Compensatory in Nature.

The petitioner, Poona Shims Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 30.6.1995 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner under Section 14-B of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging EPF Attachment Over SFC Sale Property. Section 11(2) of EPF Act, 1952 creates overriding first charge on assets, enforceable against purchaser in SFC sale, not limited to insolvency or winding up.

The petitioner, M/s. Indus Agro Products, was a purchaser in a sale conducted by the State Financial Corporation under the State Financial Corporation...