Search Results for "Electricity Act, 2003"

914 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 914 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ of Quo Warranto Against Electricity Ombudsman for Lack of Standing. Petitioner failed to establish that the appointment of respondent no.2 was illegal or that he had a superior right to the post under the Electricity Act, 2003 and MERC Regulations, 2006.

The petitioner, Amol Prabhakar Joshi, a retired Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of quo warranto again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Duty on Captive Consumption — Industrial Consumers Not Entitled to Exemption Under Section 3(1)(b) of Goa Electricity Duty Act, 1985 as Self-Generated Electricity Not Supplied by Licensee or Generating Company.

The petitioners, a group of industrial companies and their directors, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to KERC Order on Cross-Subsidy Surcharge for Open Access Industrial Consumers. Cross-Subsidy Surcharge Upheld as Valid Regulatory Measure Under Sections 42, 61, 62, 86 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Star Metallics and Power Private Limited, an industrial consumer of electricity, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring distribution licensees to pay compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated period is valid and not ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), through its Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BES&T), filed a writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax TDS Case — Wheeling and Transmission Charges Not Rent Under Section 194I. Payments for Use of Transmission Lines Held Not Rent as No Transfer of Possession or Right to Use Occurs.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held that whee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Petition Challenging Ombudsman's Order to Provide New Connection Without Recovery of Previous Dues. Auction Purchaser Not Liable for Previous Owner's Electricity Arrears Under Electricity Act, 2003.

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman, Nagpu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Electricity Demand Notice for Violation of Natural Justice. Demand of Rs. 56,03,815.50 set aside as no opportunity of hearing was given before raising the demand under the Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Twenty First Century Wire Rods Limited, challenged a demand notice dated 22.09.2003 issued by respondent no.3 and the appellate order ...