Search Results for "Drug offender"

191 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 191 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Telangana Case -- Daughter's Appeal Succeeds on Grounds of Insufficient Material for Public Order Threat

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal challenging the preventive detention order against Aruna Bai alias Anguri Bai under the Telangana Prevention of Da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Detention Order in Drug Offender Case Due to Unexplained Delay — Live Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention. Preventive Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Set Aside as Delay of 40 Days Between Arrest and Order Remained Unexplained.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Thirumoorthy, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in NDPS Case Based on Confessional Statements and Recovery of Charas. Statements under Section 67 of NDPS Act, 1985 held admissible and voluntary, and recovery of contraband from house and auto rickshaw established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The Supreme Court of India heard two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had affirmed the conviction of S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence for Doctor in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case, Replacing Imprisonment with Fine. Conviction Under Section 18A for Non-Disclosure of Manufacturer's Name Upheld, But Sentence Reduced Based on Lack of Intent to Sell and Small Quantity of Medicines.

The appeal arose from an order of the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 6th September 2021 in CRLRC No.413 of 2019, which refused interference ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 21(c) NDPS Act but Reduces Sentence to 16 Years. Court Holds That Section 32B Does Not Limit Sentencing Discretion to Enumerated Factors; Other Relevant Factors Like Quantity May Be Considered.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The appellant, Rafiq Qu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Food Adulteration Cases Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedures Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Failure to Follow Section 47 and Rule 2.4.2 of the Manual of Procedures Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, through a common judgment, allowed three criminal writ petitions challenging the validity of criminal proceedings...