Search Results for "Draft Development Plan"

645 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 645 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Modification of Development Plan Under MRTP Act for Non-Compliance with Section 31(3) and Section 37. The court held that modification of land reservation from educational to residential is substantial and requires notice and hearing.

The petitioner, Modern Education Society, Vita, a registered public trust engaged in educational activities, challenged a part of the notification dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Constitutional Validity of Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 in Public Interest Litigation. Sections 10-17, 33-37, and 39 of the Act are not unconstitutional as they provide for public participation and do not delegate essential legislative functions.

The petitioner, The United Goans Foundation, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Declaring Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. Landowner Held Entitled to Develop Land After Reservation Lapses Automatically Without Need for Representation.

The petitioner, Pralhad Tulsiram Bundele, owned land bearing Survey No.31/4, area 1.09 HR, at Village Khel Traymbak Narayan, Taluka Achalpur, District...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Garden and Playground in Development Plan. Land Reserved Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Delay or Change of Purpose Once Acquisition Proceedings Are Initiated.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Abhijit Chandrakant Chaunda and Chandrashekhar Mallikarjunappa Bidve challenging the acquisition of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Deemed Lapse of Land Reservation for High School and Playground Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966. Failure to Acquire Land Within Prescribed Period Results in Lapse of Reservation and Entitlement to Develop Land as Per Adjacent Permissible Use.

The petitioners, four private limited companies, owned a plot of land bearing Survey No.42/1+2/2/5 admeasuring 7652 sq. meters at Nashik. The land was...