Search Results for "Distinctive Packaging"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Distinctive Packaging"

56 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 56 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Involving Perfume Brands. Court restrains defendants from using marks deceptively similar to plaintiffs' registered trademarks and artistic logos, finding prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

7 May 2026

The plaintiffs, Ahmed Perfumes LLC and M/s. Ahmed Al Maghribi Perfumes Trading LLC, both UAE-based companies in the perfume business, filed a Commerci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Over Descriptive Mark 'OCTRIDE'. Court holds that the mark is descriptive of the active ingredient Octreotide and lacks distinctiveness, and balance of convenience favors the defendant.

4 May 2026

The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited, filed a commercial IP suit seeking an interim injunction to restrain the defendant, United Biotech Pri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'HAYWARDS 5000' v. 'COX 5000'. The court held that the Plaintiff's registered trademarks 'HAYWARDS 5000' and 'FIVE THOUSAND' were infringed by the Defendants' use of 'COX 5000', and the Defendants were restrained from using the impugned mark.

8 Dec 2025

The Plaintiff, Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd., filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, Jagpin Brewerise Limited & Ors., fro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Dabur in Disparagement and Trademark Infringement Suit Over Amla Hair Oil Advertisements. The court held that the defendant's television commercial disparaged the plaintiff's 'Nihar' amla hair oil by falsely implying inferiority, violating principles of comparative advertising under trademark law.

4 Dec 2019

The plaintiff, Marico Limited, a manufacturer of household brands including 'Nihar' amla hair oil, filed a commercial IP suit alleging that the defend...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case in Trademark Dispute Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Allegations of deceptive similarity in tea packaging held to be primarily a civil trademark infringement matter, not warranting criminal prosecution under Sections 420, 34 IPC and Sections 27, 28, 103, 104 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

24 Sep 2018

The Bombay High Court, at its Aurangabad bench, considered a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking q...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Appeal Against Denial of Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Passing Off Dispute, Holding No Prima Facie Case or Balance of Convenience. Phonetic Similarity of 'CHYMTRAL FORTE' to 'CHYMORAL FORTE' Insufficient for Interim Relief Where Drugs are Schedule H Prescription Medicines and Public Interest Favors Affordable Pricing.

17 Nov 2017

The dispute arose from Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited's claim that Wockhardt Limited and East African (India) Remedies Pvt. Ltd. were passing off the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Interim Relief Granted for Alleged Deceptive Similarity Between 'DEXORANGE' and 'LUPINEXORANGE'. The court held that the marks were visually and phonetically distinct, and the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case for interim injunction.

10 Feb 2017

The appellant, Franco-Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against an order of the learned Single Judge refusing to grant interim relief ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for ANTITHYROX and THYROX Against Defendant's LETHYROX. No deceptive similarity found as prefix 'LE' distinguishes marks and THYROX is descriptive of thyroid treatment.

29 May 2013

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a suit against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another for infringement of their registered trad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Decree for Infringement of Trademark and Copyright in Colgate Tooth Powder Can. Plaintiffs proved that defendants used a deceptively similar can for tooth powder, infringing registered trademark No. 290361 and copyright in the artistic work.

26 Aug 2005

The plaintiffs, Colgate-Palmolive Company and Colgate Palmolive (India) Limited, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court against M/s. Hindustan Rimmer a...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)