Search Results for "Depositor Protection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Depositor Protection"

42 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.

2 Jul 2026

The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Special Court to Consider Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application in KPIDFE Act Proceedings — Rejection of Application as Not Maintainable Set Aside. The Special Court under KPIDFE Act must adjudicate maintainability applications under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on merits, as CPC applies to its proceedings.

8 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Smt. Vanitha S., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Company in Consumer Protection Case and Remands to NCDRC for Merits Decision. The Court held that deposit of surplus funds in a fixed deposit by a company does not automatically constitute commercial purpose under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, requiring examination of dominant intention, and allegations of fraud do not oust consumer forum jurisdiction if deficiency in service is alleged.

19 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a judgment and order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 13.03.2023, which dismissed the appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Freezing of Properties by Investigating Officer in Bank Fraud Case — Lack of Statutory Authority Under M.P.I.D. Act. Investigating Officer Cannot Freeze Immovable Properties Without Legal Provision; Bail Conditions Already Complied With.

16 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Vijaykumar alias Vijay S/o Sitaram Dandanaik, was the chairman of Vasantdada Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd, Osmanabad. He was arrested in c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Director in Deposit Fraud Case — No Specific Allegations of Mens Rea or Active Involvement. Petitioner, a director of a finance company, was charged under IPC and Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, but the court found no material showing her participation in the company's affairs or inducement of depositors.

29 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Pratibha Sadanand Shetty, was arraigned as an accused in Crime No. 2 of 2020 registered at Malad Police Station, Mumbai, for offences ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Conviction for Cheque Bounce Upheld. Dishonour of Cheque for Discharge of Existing Debt Attracts Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

18 Nov 2022

The criminal revision petition was filed by the accused-petitioner challenging the judgment dated 31.10.2012 passed by the II Addl. District and Sessi...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Recall of Credit Facilities and SARFAESI Notice — Alternative Remedy Available. Petitioner's challenge to recall of credit facilities and SARFAESI notice dismissed as not maintainable due to availability of alternative remedy under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act.

8 Aug 2022

The petitioner, M/s Nitesh Residency Hotels Pvt. Ltd., a heavy borrower, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MPID Act Appeal for Return of Seized Property to Accused Pending Trial — Property Not Proceeds of Crime Under MPID Act. Court holds that Section 3 of MPID Act does not authorize continued retention of property not linked to deposits, and directs release of vehicle and cash to appellant subject to conditions.

30 Nov 2017

The Bombay High Court allowed Criminal Appeal No. 813 of 2016 filed by Suresh Raju Shetty, challenging an order of the Designated Court under the Maha...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal and Restores Conviction for Cheque Dishonour. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 operates in favour of the complainant once the signature on the cheque is admitted, and the accused failed to rebut the presumption of legally enforceable debt.

19 Jul 2013

The appellant, Krishna P. Morajkar, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, which set aside the convict...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)