Search Results for "Departmental proceedings barred"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Departmental proceedings barred"

232 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Air Force Officer in Administrative Action Under Air Force Act, 1950. Administrative dismissal under Section 19 read with Rule 16 of Air Force Rules, 1969 is not barred by the three-year limitation period for court-martial under Section 121 of the Air Force Act, 1950, as limitation applies only to trial by court-martial, not to administrative proceedings.

15 Apr 2026

The dispute involved a former Indian Air Force officer challenging his dismissal from service under the Air Force Act, 1950. The appellant, commission...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner in Property Dispute and Electricity Disconnection Case Due to Time-Barred Municipal Action and Violation of Court Order. BBMP's Cancellation of Khata After 20 Years Held Time-Barred Under Section 114A of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, and BESCOM's Disconnection Notice Quashed for Disregarding Interim Status Quo Order.

26 Feb 2026

The dispute involved two consolidated writ petitions concerning property rights and administrative actions. The petitioner had acquired Flat No. 3 in ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Revenue Appeal Against ITAT Order Deleting Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2006-07 Due to Defective Notice; Questions Validity of Penalty Initiation Despite Retrospective Amendment to Section 271(1B)

17 Mar 2023

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, arose from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru, which had allowed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order Reinstating Railway Employee in Disciplinary Case — Non-Supply of Inquiry Report Violates Natural Justice. Removal from Service Set Aside as Disciplinary Authority Failed to Provide Copy of Inquiry Report Before Imposing Penalty, Contrary to Principles of Natural Justice.

13 Mar 2023

The Union of India challenged the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) Mumbai dated 25 November 2010 in Original Application No. 148 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pensionary Benefits to Retired Employee Despite Upholding Removal Order Due to Delay. Petitioner's challenge to removal dismissed as barred by laches, but court directs payment of pension and gratuity as per rules.

28 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar s/o Devidas Deshmukh, a retired Tax Collector from Amravati Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Petroleum Dealers Challenging VAT Assessment Orders. Assessment orders under Dadra and Nagar Haveli Value Added Tax Act, 2005 set aside as barred by limitation and violative of natural justice.

21 May 2021

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by several petroleum dealers (M/s. Yogi Petroleum, Jay Jalaram Construction Co., M/s. Ratan P...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Delivers Common Order in Writ Petitions on Disciplinary Enquiry Against Assistant Public Prosecutors. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution Challenging KSAT Orders Which Upheld Lokayukta's Enquiry Under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 and Karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1957.

14 May 2020

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed by Assistant Public Prosecutors-cum-Assistant Government Pleaders under Articles 226 and 227 of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Probation Period Extended Validly Under Service Rules. Termination of Probationer Without Stigma Upheld as Employer's Discretion Under Regulation 11 of MSETCL Service Regulations.

24 Oct 2016

The petitioners, Chandrashekhar Tukarampant Madankar, Anup Udhav Lokhande, and Harshal Radheshyam Malewar, were appointed as Junior Engineers (Electri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets 'Filed' in ITO Order as Termination of Proceedings Under Section 34 of Income-tax Act, 1922. The Order That a Case is 'Filed' Disposes of the Proceeding, Rendering Fresh Notice for Reassessment Valid.

3 Oct 1966

The case arose from reassessment proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1922. The Additional Income-tax Officer issued a notice under Section 34 and, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Termination During Probation Valid Without Stigma or Mala Fides. Probationer has no right to the post and termination simpliciter during probation does not attract principles of natural justice.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by probationary employees of the Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd (MSETCL) chal...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)