Search Results for "Department Promotion Committee"

475 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 475 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State and Employee in Service Rule Relaxation Dispute. High Court's Quashing of Government Order Granting Promotion Set Aside as Relaxation Was Validly Granted.

The Supreme Court heard two sets of appeals arising from a judgment of the Madras High Court in Writ Appeal No. 996 of 2015 and an order dismissing Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Promotion and transfer of employee challenged in Industrial Court. The Industrial Court shall decide the Complaint uninfluenced by the same.

The Indian Express (P) Ltd. promoted Rane from Senior Printer to Supervisor and transferred him to the Walunj Printing Press in Aurangabad, citing e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in MACP Scheme Financial Upgradation Dispute. Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Entitles Employees to Next Higher Grade Pay, Not Grade Pay of Next Promotional Post.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against orders of various High Courts and Central Administrative Tribunals...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in OAS Recruitment Case — No Right Accrues from Mere Recommendation. Mere recommendation for promotion does not confer a vested right; abolition of cadre and repeal of rules extinguishes any claim.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Orissa against the judgment of the Orissa High Court which had directed the State to conve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Punjab State Power Corporation in Pay Parity Dispute Between Head Clerks and Internal Auditors. Internal Auditors Not Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Head Clerks Due to Different Recruitment, Duties, and Promotional Avenues.

The case involves a dispute between the Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (appellant) and Rajesh Kumar Jindal and others (respondents), who are I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Promotion with Retrospective Effect in Air India Corporation Case. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to promotion or that the Respondent acted arbitrarily in not promoting him.

The Petitioner, T.S. Kolhatkar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction ...