Search Results for "Delay and acquiescence"

340 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 340 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Trust's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Market Yard Due to Delay and Laches. Challenge to Preliminary Notification Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Filed After Over a Year Held Not Maintainable.

The Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust filed two writ petitions challenging the acquisition of its land by the State of Karnataka for the benefit of the Agricu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Limitation for Suit Against Port Trust Under Section 120 of Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. Plaintiffs' Notice Under Section 120 Sent More Than Five Years After Lease Expiry and Accrual of Cause of Action.

The suit was instituted by Kewal Kishan Aggarwal and others against the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai seeking renewal of seven leases that e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State's Appeal in Contract Dispute, Upholds Decree for Payment of ₹43,03,412.92 with Interest. Delay and Hindrances Caused by State Constitute Breach of Contract, Entitling Contractor to Damages.

The State of Goa, through the Chief Secretary, appealed against the judgment and order dated 12.11.2009 passed by the District Judge-II, North Goa, Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Retain Allotment Despite Delay in Payment of Lease Premium — Condonation of Delay Granted. Petitioner's failure to pay installments on time due to COVID-19 pandemic condoned, allotment restored on payment of interest and DPC.

The petitioner, Narayani Trexim Pvt. Ltd., participated in a tender floated by CIDCO for lease of a plot in Sector 18, Vashi, Navi Mumbai. It was the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks OROFER and OROFER-XT vs COROFER and COROFER-XT. Court finds deceptive similarity and rejects acquiescence defense under Section 33 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Corona Remedies Pvt. Ltd., alleging that t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses State of Goa's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Bridge Construction Dispute, Upholding Rejection of Objections Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

The State of Goa appealed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the rejection of its objections under Section 34 of t...