Search Results for "Court Fees"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Court Fees"

4447 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4447 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Trust Property Suit. Court Fees Held Properly Paid as Suit Was for Injunction, Not Recovery of Money.

22 Feb 2018

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (applicants) challenging an order of the trial court dated 15/11/2016 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Rejection of Order VII Rule 11 Application in Counter-Claim for Possession Based on Leave and License Agreement. The court held that the civil court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a counter-claim based on a leave and license agreement due to the bar under Section 47 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and that valuation and court fees must be determined based on the relief claimed.

11 Nov 2024

The petitioner, original plaintiff, filed a suit for specific performance of contract against the respondent. The respondent filed a written statement...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Valuation of Suit for Court Fees in Property Dispute. Court holds that where a sale deed is challenged as void ab initio, the plaintiff need not pay ad valorem court fees on the market value of the property, and the suit is properly valued under Section 6(iv)(j) of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

28 Sep 2010

The petitioner, original defendant No.1, challenged the valuation of the suit for the purpose of payment of court fees. The respondents, original plai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint for Non-Payment of Proper Court Fees in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 7(iv)(c) and Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 Section 6(iv)(j) require ad valorem court fees on market value where plaintiff is not in possession.

9 Feb 2010

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the plaintiffs (revision applicants) against an order of the trial court rejecting their plain...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sale Not Disputed by Defendants. The court held that the valuation of the suit property by the plaintiff was not shown to be arbitrary or mala fide, and the defendants had not disputed the agreement to sale, thus the plaint could not be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

5 Dec 2022

The applicant, Prakash Wanjari, along with two others, entered into an agreement to sale dated 18/01/2009 with the non-applicants (defendants) for the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal's Reduction of Compensation Set Aside. Claimants Entitled to Full Loss of Dependency of Rs.12,01,176/- Despite Restriction of Claim in Petition, as Deficit Court Fees Were Offered.

26 Sep 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Latur, which reduced the compensation awarded to the appellants (children of t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Trial Court Orders in Suit for Possession. Court upholds refusal to reject plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and appointment of commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC to identify suit property.

26 Aug 2014

The petitioners, S. Ramaiah, S. Siddappa, and S. Nanjappa, claimed to be owners of agricultural lands measuring 7 acres and 10 guntas in Nagarbhavi vi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging Acquisition of Property Under MHADA Act. Challenge to Acquisition Notices and Notification Under Section 41 of Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority Act, 1976 for Alleged Procedural Lapses and Lack of Structural Dilapidation.

20 Jan 2005

This first appeal arises from a suit filed by the plaintiffs, trustees of a public charitable trust, who claimed ownership of certain buildings known ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Trial Court's Order on Court-Fees Valuation in Suit for Registration under Section 77 of Registration Act. Suit for Enforcement of Statutory Obligation Not Susceptible of Monetary Valuation, Governed by Section 6(iv)(j) of Bombay Court-fees Act, 1958, Not Section 6(xi).

5 Jul 2019

The petitioners, as plaintiffs, filed a suit in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pune under Section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908, seekin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal in Court Fee Matter — Declaration Suit Not Attracting Ad Valorem Fee Under Section 7(iv-A) U.P. Amendment. Decree for Mere Declaration of Title Is Not a 'Decree for Money or Other Property' and a Decree Ad Invitum Is Not an 'Instrument Securing Money or Other Property' Under the Court Fees Act, 1870, as Amended by U.P. Legislature.

26 Sep 1969

The dispute originated from a property inheritance matter. One Radhey Lal had filed Suit No. 4 of 1950 in the court of the Civil Judge, Jaunpur, claim...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)