Search Results for "Counterclaim"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Counterclaim"

288 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 288 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Divorce Case — Remand Without Deciding Merits Not Permissible Under Order 41 Rule 23A CPC. Appellate Court Must First Reverse Decree on Merits Before Remanding Under Order 41 Rule 23A of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

23 Jan 2017

The case arises from a matrimonial dispute where the respondent-wife filed a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(i)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 19...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Counterclaims as Time-Barred. Court holds that limitation for counterclaims arising from same transaction as main claim is governed by Article 1 of Limitation Act, 1963, and that the arbitral tribunal erred in applying a strict three-year period from the date of termination without considering the continuing breach and the date of final bill.

1 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Rolta India Limited, filed two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement to Include Counterclaim in Specific Performance Suit — No Bar Under Order VIII Rule 6A CPC for Counterclaim Arising After Filing Suit. The court held that a counterclaim arising after the suit but before filing of written statement can be introduced by amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, and such counterclaim is not barred by limitation if filed within three years under Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

20 Jan 2005

The petitioner, Mrs. Ivy Muriet Fonseca, was the defendant in Special Civil Suit No. 85/2001/C filed by the respondent, Mr. Porus Adi Dotor, seeking s...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Contractor's Appeal in Breach of Contract Damages Case — Limitation Period for Suit by Panchayat Runs from Date of Termination of Contract, Not from Date of Breach. The court held that the suit for damages filed by the Panchayat was within limitation under Article 55 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as the contract was terminated on 27.2.1989, and the suit was filed on 25.2.1992.

21 Jan 2026

The case involves a First Appeal filed by the original defendants (contractor) against the judgment and decree dated 30.9.2002 passed by the learned C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Indian Oil Corporation Against Eviction Decree — Lease Not Renewed, Tenant Becomes Trespasser After Expiry of Lease Period Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The court held that a tenant continuing in possession after lease expiry with landlord's consent becomes a tenant at will, not a trespasser, and cannot claim adverse possession.

24 Jul 2014

The case involves a dispute between Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (petitioner/defendant) and Surendrakumar Sahani (respondent/plaintiff) over a lease of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Telecom Billing Dispute — Claim Barred by Section 15 of TRAI Act, 1997. Counterclaim for unpaid bills upheld with 12% interest as petitioner failed to challenge tariff orders before TRAI or Appellate Tribunal.

30 Jul 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Kansan Communications Pvt. Ltd., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeals in Contract Dispute Over Development of Land — Holds That Work Order Constitutes a Contract and That Termination Without Notice Is Invalid Under Specific Relief Act, 1963. The court also held that the suit for damages was barred by limitation as the cause of action arose in 1991 and the suit was filed in 1999.

6 May 2011

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a judgment and decree dated 13-8-2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division at Mapusa in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Procedural Order on Discovery — Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Does Not Permit Challenge to Procedural Orders, Only Final Awards.

18 Nov 2010

The case involves a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Tata Industries Limited and another against Gras...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Net Delay Compensation Concept Not Permissible Under Contract. The Court held that the Arbitrator's approach of awarding compensation based on 'net delay' was contrary to the express terms of the contract and remanded the counterclaim for fresh adjudication.

26 Jun 2012

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from a construction contract d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the arbitral award was not in conflict with public policy and did not suffer from patent illegality, as the tribunal's findings were based on evidence and were plausible.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, MPDA Associates Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)