Search Results for "Corruption allegations"

1034 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1034 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Criminal Misconduct. Conviction under Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 set aside as prosecution failed to prove abuse of official position or pecuniary advantage.

The appellant, Waman Somaji Burde, was the District Deputy Registrar (Cooperative Societies) in Nagpur from 1 July 1985 to 13 May 1987. He was prosecu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unfair Trial. Sanctioning Authority Not Examined and Contents of Sanction Order Not Proved, Rendering Conviction Unsustainable Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Devidas Jagannath Joshi, was convicted by the Special Court (ACB), Nagpur, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Accused Revenue Inspector and Middleman Challenged Trial Court's Conviction for Demanding and Accepting Bribe for Change of Khata, Alleging Invalid Sanction and Procedural Errors.

The criminal appeal arose from the judgment of conviction and sentence by the Special Court in Spl. Case No.679/2011 dated 13.06.2013, convicting the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, M.C. Manjunatha, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Mysore, in Special Case No. 69/2004 for offences puni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of Chandrabhan Sadavarti, the original appellant, under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Chandrakant Nivrutti Pagar, a Talathi, was convicted by the Special Judge (Anti Corruption), Nashik for offences under Sections 7, 13(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yadav Rajbahadur Ghyansingh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Mehsana, for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal by Accused Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Conviction Challenge Hinges on Proof of Demand and Credibility of Complainant.

The appeal arose from a conviction by the Special Court under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Gopal Ambadas Gawali, a Police Head Constable, charged under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2)...