Search Results for "Consumer Complaint"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Consumer Complaint"

448 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 448 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarified the Scope of Interim Moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Held That Regulatory Penalties Imposed by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Are Not Covered

4 Mar 2025

Invoking Insolvency Proceedings Cannot stay execution of Penalty Orders for Consumer Protection Law Violations – The Apex Court Upheld the NCDRC’s...

Supreme Court

Complainant not required to prove service obtained for self-employment livelihood unless appellant proves commercial purpose.

10 May 2024

Consumer Protection - Maintainability of Complaint - Definition of Consumer - Service obtained for Commercial Purpose - Onus of Proof - Burden of Proo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Execution of Decrees Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact by Cooperative Courts. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution, it cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless perverse or without jurisdiction.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed in execution proceedings und...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against NCDRC Order Condoning Delay in Filing Written Statement — Prospective Application of Limitation Period Under Section 13 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court held that the NCDRC's discretion exercised before the Constitution Bench judgment in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. was valid and not liable to be interfered with.

14 Dec 2021

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 25 February 2020, which condoned a delay of 100 da...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Appeals by Builder Against Execution Orders in Consumer Complaints — Upholds State Commission's Directions for Compliance with Settlement Terms.

30 Nov -0001

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) heard a batch of appeals filed by M/s. Samar Estates Private Limited and its directors aga...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Company in Consumer Protection Case and Remands to NCDRC for Merits Decision. The Court held that deposit of surplus funds in a fixed deposit by a company does not automatically constitute commercial purpose under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, requiring examination of dominant intention, and allegations of fraud do not oust consumer forum jurisdiction if deficiency in service is alleged.

19 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a judgment and order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 13.03.2023, which dismissed the appell...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.

24 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Company in Consumer Protection Case, Holding Purchase of Software for Business Expansion is Commercial Purpose. Company Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as Goods Used for Profit Generation.

1 Jan 2025

The appellant, M/s Poly Medicure Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, filed a consumer complaint before the State Consumer Disputes R...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Limitation and Maintainability Under Consumer Protection Act 1986. Complaint Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose When Municipal Authorities First Demanded Higher Charges, Not Continuing, and Not Maintainable as Appellant Not a Consumer Under Section 2(1)(d) for Property Tax and Water Services Provided by Municipal Authorities.

11 Jan 2022

The appeal originated from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dated 3 December 2018, which dismissed a consumer complai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Order Against Non-Party — Order Directing Compensation to Complainants Set Aside as Petitioner Not Impleaded as Opposite Party. The Court Held That No Order Can Be Passed Against a Person Without Giving Them an Opportunity of Being Heard, and the Consumer Forum Exceeded Its Jurisdiction.

20 Dec 2018

The petitioner, Govind Dewaji Chavan, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 27-12-2016 passed by the District Consumer Disput...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)