Search Results for "Composite Agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Composite Agreement"

455 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 455 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition by Retired Partners in Debt Recovery Case Upholding DRT and DRAT Orders. Retired Partners Remain Liable for Original Bank Loan as Bank Did Not Formally Release Them Despite Reconstitution of Partnership Firm and Execution of Fresh Agreements with New Partners Under Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

16 Feb 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by two retired partners of M/s. Srishti Components, a partnership firm, challenging orders of the Debts R...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Referring Dispute to Arbitration in Commercial Suit — Arbitration Agreement Not Duly Signed by Plaintiff. Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires existence of valid arbitration agreement; mere reference in invoices insufficient.

8 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Tusker Workspace Pvt. Ltd., filed a commercial suit (Com. O.S. No.207/2024) before the LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdictional Ruling in Distributor Agreement Dispute. Arbitration Clause Not Extended by Conduct Despite Continued Commercial Dealings Post-Expiry of Two-Year Term.

21 Feb 2025

The case involves an appeal under Section 37(2)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Raymond Limited against an order of the lea...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.

15 Oct 2024

The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Stay on Interest Demand in MVAT Case — Tribunal Erred in Treating Composite Order as Non-Appealable Under Section 30(2). The court held that an appellate order confirming interest under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, when part of a composite assessment order, is appealable and stay can be granted.

6 Jun 2023

The petitioner, S. K. Trading Co., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30 Septemb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Applications to Appoint Arbitrator in LLP and Trust Dispute Over School Management Agreements. Court Holds That Arbitration Clause in School Management Services Agreement Binds Non-Signatory Trust Due to Interconnected Agreements.

23 Dec 2022

The judgment concerns two arbitration applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Edufocus International Edu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Impleadment of Non-Signatory Group Company in Arbitration Under Group of Companies Doctrine. The court held that a non-signatory parent company can be bound by an arbitration agreement when the mutual intention of the parties is to bind both signatory and non-signatory entities, based on factors such as relationship, commonality of subject matter, and composite nature of transactions.

1 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private Limited, filed a petition under Sections 11(5), 11(9), and 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Concilia...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Financier's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Hire-Purchase Repossession — Held That Financier Is Not a 'Service Provider' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for Repossession of Vehicle on Default. The court ruled that repossession of a vehicle under a hire-purchase agreement after default is a contractual right and not a deficiency in service.

1 Jan 2019

The appeal arose from a consumer dispute where the respondent, Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, had entered into a hire-purchase agreement with the appellant, M/s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Television Production Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Reputation. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that claimant failed to prove loss of reputation due to alleged breach of contract.

8 May 2015

The petitioners, Star India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 8 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in Dispute Over Development Agreements — Arbitration Clause Binding on Non-Signatory Transferee. The court held that a non-signatory who claims through or under a signatory to an arbitration agreement is bound by the arbitration clause, and appointed a retired judge as sole arbitrator.

30 Sep 2014

The judgment concerns two related matters: a Notice of Motion (No. 540 of 2013) in Suit No. 62 of 2013 and an Arbitration Application (No. 86 of 2013)...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)