Search Results for "Coal Bearing Areas Act"

63 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 63 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Grand-Daughter's Employment Claim Under R&R Policy 2008 for Land Acquisition by Western Coal Fields Ltd. — Inclusive Definition of 'Family' Includes Other Relatives

The petitioners, Namdeo (land owner) and his grand-daughter Sonu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking employm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence for Terror Funding. Payment of Extortion Money Under Duress for Business Operations Does Not Constitute Terror Funding Under Section 17 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

The dispute arose from a criminal appeal concerning bail denial to an accused charged with multiple offences, including under the Unlawful Activities ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Resolution Professional in IBC Moratorium Dispute. Section 14(1)(d) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prohibits owner from recovering property occupied by corporate debtor during moratorium, even under joint development agreement.

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the interpretation of Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The appellant, Ra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Private Company and Directors in Coal Scam Case, Upholds CBI Investigation. Post-Facto Consent Under Section 6 of DSPE Act Valid for Public Servants Not Named in FIR, Private Individuals Lack Locus to Challenge Investigation.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the Allahabad High Court's order upholding CBI investigation in a coal scam case. The case arose from ...