Search Results for "Cheating"

81 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Dismissed Appeal – Conviction under Ranbir Penal Code and Prevention of Corruption Act Upheld. Forgery, Cheating, and Corruption Charges Proven – Conviction and Sentence Affirmed

Acts and Sections: Constitution of India (COI) – Not directly involved but constitutional principles of fair trial considered Code of Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage on Grounds of Irretrievable Breakdown, Quashes Extradition Proceedings, and Awards Permanent Alimony

Supreme Court Exercises Powers Under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to Dissolve Marriage, Quash Litigations, and Direct Release of Impounded...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Constitution of India, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Bail Granted in Economic Offence Involving Cryptocurrency Scam – Judicial Discretion Under Section 437(6) of CrPC – Deposit of Partial Amount Mandated

Regular bail granted in an economic offence concerning a cryptocurrency scam involving approximately ₹4 Crore – Trial Court directed to impose con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Set Aside High Court Bail Order for Non-Compliance with Section 45 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) – Appeal Allowed – Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration.

Supreme Court Held That Bail Under PMLA Requires Mandatory Compliance with Twin Conditions Under Section 45 – High Court Order Granting Bail Set Asi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Recruitment Process for Class-IV Posts in Jharkhand Due to Violation of Constitutional Mandate. Advertisement Dated 29.07.2010 Declared Void Ab Initio – Fresh Recruitment Ordered with Age Relaxation.

Advertisement Declared Void – The Supreme Court held that the advertisement dated 29.07.2010 was invalid and the recruitment process was null and v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashed FIR and Charge-Sheet Against Hospital Directors — Purely Civil Dispute With No Criminality Involved Tagline: No Ingredients of Cheating Established — Criminal Proceedings Termed an Abuse of Law Headnote: Acts and Sections Discussed: Constitution of India (COI) — Article 226 (Writ Jurisdiction) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 (Inherent Powers of High Court) Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 418 (Cheating With Knowledge), Section 420 (Cheating and Dishonest Inducement), Section 34 (Acts Done by Several Persons in Furtherance of Common Intention) Keywords:Writ Jurisdiction — Quashing of FIR — Commercial Transaction — Civil Suit — Non-Payment of Dues — Abuse of Process — No Criminal Offence Nature of the Litigation:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR and charge-sheet. Petitioners’ Relief Sought:Quashing of FIR No.98 of 2020 lodged at Bhosari Police Station and the charge-sheet arising from it. Reason for Filing the Case:Allegations of non-payment of professional dues and financial aid advanced to the hospital. Prior Decisions:Special Civil Suit No.1161 of 2018 filed by the complainant for recovery of Rs.53,11,652/- was pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune. Issues:Whether the dispute between the parties was of a civil or criminal nature, and whether criminal proceedings were maintainable alongside a pending civil suit. Submissions/Arguments:(a) Petitioners: FIR related to events preceding their control of the hospital — No criminal intention or inducement established — Civil suit already instituted for the same financial claims. (b) Respondents: Civil and criminal proceedings can proceed simultaneously — Alleged WhatsApp messages demonstrated promises to clear dues. Decision:FIR and charge-sheet quashed — Court held that the case was purely civil in nature, with no elements of cheating or criminality — Proceedings deemed an abuse of process of law. Ratio:No criminal offence was made out against the petitioners — Allegations of non-payment related to a period before the petitioners took control of the hospital — Civil remedy already sought by the complainant — No dishonest inducement proven as required under Sections 415 and 420 of IPC. Relevant Paragraphs:Paras 9, 10, and 11 of the judgment outline the court’s rationale for quashing the FIR and charge-sheet.

FIR and charge-sheet quashed — Court held that the case was purely civil in nature, with no elements of cheating or criminality — Proceedings deem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Quashing of FIR – Protection under Official Duty – Absence of Mens Rea

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 482 – Quashing of FIR – High Court refused to quash the FIR despite lack of prima facie evidence agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Petitioner’s Plea for Discharge in Land Conspiracy Dismissed by Bombay High Court. Court affirms prima facie evidence of land fraud and conspiracy involving government land.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and Article 227 of the Constitution. The petitioner, an advocate, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR: Civil Dispute Misinterpreted as Criminal Offense. Justice prevails as the Court clarifies the distinction between civil and criminal liability.

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against applicants, emphasizing the civil nature of the dispute and ...