Search Results for "Chandrapur"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Chandrapur"

758 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 758 result(s)

High Court

High Court Pronounces Oral Judgment in Cross Appeals Involving Kidnapping, Murder, and Conspiracy Under IPC Sections 364-A, 302, 120-B, 201/34. Both State and Accused Filed Appeals Against Trial Court Conviction and Sentence, With the Accused Challenging the Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence.

23 Dec 2025

The present matter concerns two criminal appeals arising from the judgment and order dated 30.11.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Additional Commissioner's Orders in Gram Panchayat Disqualification Appeals. Delegation of Powers Under Section 13(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Remains Valid Despite Amendment to Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

12 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Amitkumar Bankar, challenged orders of the Additional Commissioner dated 18.01.2023 that set aside the Collector's disqualification of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Held That Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata. The court held that the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC when the allegations in the plaint, taken as true, disclose a cause of action and the issues of limitation and res judicata require trial.

10 Apr 2023

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction against the respondents, including the State a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of Contribution to District Mineral Foundation Under Rule 45(1A) of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 — Rule Held Ultra Vires the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The court quashed demands for DMF contribution as a condition for mineral dispatch, ruling that Rule 45(1A) is beyond the rule-making power under Section 15 of the MMDR Act.

7 Apr 2022

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by mining lessees challenging the demand for contribution to the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Chairman and Deputy Chairman of Panchayat Samiti for Violation of Mandatory Notice Period Under Section 66(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. The court held that the 15-day notice requirement is mandatory and non-compliance invalidates the resolution.

25 Sep 2020

The petitioners, who were the Chairman and Deputy Chairman of Panchayat Samiti Nagbhid, challenged a no-confidence motion passed against them in a spe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Abetment to Suicide. Conviction under Sections 498A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or instigation leading to suicide.

6 Jul 2017

The appellant, Chandrakumar Sundardas Taneja, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 498A and 306 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Municipal Corporator in Election Dispute Due to Conviction for House-Trespass. Conviction Under Section 448 IPC Involves Moral Turpitude, Rendering Petitioner Disqualified Under Section 10 of Maharashtra Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

26 Aug 2015

The petitioner, Karimuddin @ Karimlala Kazi, was elected as a Member of the Municipal Corporation from Prabhag No.21B on 16.04.2012. On 20.04.2012, an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

28 Sep 2012

The appellant, Sewakdas Tukaram Jumde, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Daily Wagers Challenging Termination by Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. — Petitioners Failed to Prove 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Section 25-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to four writ petitions filed by daily wagers (Kisan Atmaram Kasti, Hari Shravan Randive, Manohar Shripat Sakharkar, and Yogeshwa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Water Cess Levy on Industrial Groundwater Use. Levy under Section 12 of Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976 is compensatory and regulatory, not a tax, and validly imposed on industries drawing groundwater for commercial purposes.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by industrial companies—BILT Graphic Paper Products Ltd., UltraTech CemCo Ltd., and Associated Ceme...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)