Search Results for "Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules"

539 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 539 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tribunal Order on Pay Protection for Regularized Employees. Pay Fixation Directed Afresh with Protection of Last Pay Drawn, but Seniority and Other Benefits Denied.

The petitioners, Anil D. Kagathara and another, were initially engaged as casual labourers with the respondent department and were later regularized. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State Government's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Temporary Employees in Government Hospitals. Back Door Entry Without Selection Process Disqualifies Claim for Regularisation Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The State Government filed eight petitions challenging a common judgment of the Industrial Court, Satara, which had directed continuation of services ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Casual Labourer Challenging Termination Without Inquiry. Services of monthly-rated casual labourer without temporary status can be terminated without holding disciplinary inquiry.

The petitioner, Rajendra Kashinath Badgujar, was appointed as a casual labourer in the Central Railway, Manmad, with effect from 23rd December 1987. H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order in Railway Casual Labour Reinstatement Case. Central Administrative Tribunal's order for reinstatement of casual labour with continuity of service upheld as Railways failed to prove abandonment of service.

The petitioners, Union of India through the Divisional Railway Manager, Central Railways, challenged the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Temporary Lecturers Challenging Termination — Ad Hoc Appointments Made Without Following Recruitment Rules Do Not Confer Right to Regularisation or Reinstatement.

The case involves a writ petition filed by 25 individuals who were appointed as temporary lecturers on ad hoc basis at Government Polytechnic College,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Direct Recruit Deputy Collectors and State of Uttarakhand in Seniority Dispute. Promotee Deputy Collectors Cannot Claim Seniority from Ad Hoc Appointment Date as Appointments Were Not in Accordance with Rules Under Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a seniority dispute between direct recruit and promotee Deputy Collectors in the State o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to Counting of Contractual Service for Continuity in Tribal Training Institutes. Past Contractual Service Prior to Regularisation Must Be Counted for Continuity and Pensionary Benefits Except Monetary Benefits.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dat...