Search Results for "Cash Seizure"

264 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 264 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 52A and Delay in Trial. The court held that failure to comply with mandatory provisions of Section 52A of NDPS Act and prolonged incarceration without trial justified bail despite Section 37 restrictions.

The petitioner, Shivaraj Urs, was the second accused in a case registered by the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Demand of Dowry. Conviction under Sections 304-B, 498-A IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Essential Ingredients of Dowry Death.

The appellant, H.N. Paramesh, was convicted by the Presiding Officer and Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Hassan in S.C.No.115/2007 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Articles Insufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Shivaji Vasang Bagale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sawantwadi, for the murder of Sudha Puralkar under Section 302 I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302, 364, 394, 201 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by accused Nos. 1 and 3 against their conviction under Sections 302, 364, 394 and 201 read with Section 34 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 57 — Failure to Inform Immediate Superior Officer Renders Search and Seizure Illegal. The court held that strict compliance with Section 57 of the NDPS Act, 1985 is mandatory and non-compliance vitiates the conviction.

The appellant, Ruffus Leo Manuel, was convicted by the NDPS Court at Mapusa under Section 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ...