Search Results for "CBEC"

58 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Demand Against University for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Grant Personal Hearing Renders Order Illegal Under Section 74(1) of CGST Act, 2017. Circulars Mandating Personal Hearing Before Adverse Order Are Binding on Adjudicating Authority.

The University of Mumbai, established under the Bombay University Act, 1953 and later governed by the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016, filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Vessels Imported Prior to Notification. Condition No.82 of Notification 12/2012-Cus. Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Vessels Imported Before Its Effective Date.

The petitioner, The Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd., imported two vessels, 'Jag Rishi' and 'Jag Rahul', prior to 17.03.2012. On 17.03.2012, the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Office Note Requiring Courier Companies' Authorized Signatories to Hold 'F' Card, 'G' Card or Kardex Number and Pass Examinations Under CHALR 2004. Courier Regulations Not Exempt from Customs Broker Licensing Requirements Under CHALR 2004/CBLR 2013.

The Couriers Association of India filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging an Off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Central Excise Duty Demand on Scrap Generated During Car Manufacturing. Generation of scrap during manufacturing process is not a separate taxable event under Central Excise Act, 1944.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Premier Ltd. and New Holland Fiat (India) Pvt. Ltd. challenging show cause notices issued by the Cen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against CESTAT Remand Order in Central Excise Refund Claim — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Tribunal's Remand for Fresh Adjudication with All Issues Kept Open Does Not Give Rise to Appealable Question Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The appellant, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., filed a refund claim under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Assistant Commissioner ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CBEC Circular on Service Tax Refund for Exporters — Circular Held Ultra Vires Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 93 of Finance Act, 1994.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies including Larsen & Toubro Limited, Uhde India Private Limited, Tata Tel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Settlement Commission Order Allowing Exemption for Imported Ferrari Despite Temporary UK Registration. Temporary registration for transit purposes does not disqualify a vehicle from exemption under Notification 21/2002-CUS as 'new, not registered anywhere prior to importation'.

The case involves a challenge by the Commissioner of Customs (Import) against an order of the Settlement Commission under Section 127C(5) of the Custo...