Search Results for "Bye-law interpretation"

35 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Succession Act Case — Order Granting Succession Certificate Set Aside for Lack of Notice to All Heirs. Failure to Issue Notice to Appellant Under Section 384 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The appellant, T. Nagendra Setty, filed an appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, challenging the order dated 30.08.2023 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Expulsion of Club Member — Expulsion Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Natural Justice. Member's Defamatory Conduct and Misconduct Justified Expulsion Under Club Bye-laws.

The Plaintiff, Jaisingh Choraria, a member of The National Sports Club of India since 1989, filed a suit challenging his expulsion from the Club. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Single Judge's Ruling on Lack of Jurisdiction in Section 34 Petition — Seat of Arbitration Determines Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 2(1)(e) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who held that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain a petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Excise Duty Rate on Cranes — Enacted Statute Prevails Over Discrepancy in Bill Versions. Rate of Duty Under Heading 84.26 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 is 15% Ad Valorem, Not 12% as Claimed by Manufacturer.

The petitioner, M/s. Garlick Engineering, a manufacturer of cranes, filed a writ petition challenging the rate of central excise duty applicable to cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Cricket Association Election Dispute — Interim Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction. Court holds that disputes relating to internal elections of a society are not maintainable in civil court without exhausting remedies under the Societies Registration Act, 1860.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Gopinath Munde against the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA) and its office bearers, includi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members Due to Lack of Privity and Authority. The court held that a cooperative society cannot bind its members to a development agreement without their consent, and the suit was not maintainable.

The plaintiff, Vardhman Developers Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement against Borla Co-operative Housing Society L...