Search Results for "Building plan sanction"

353 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 353 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction Permissions as Barred by Res Judicata and Laches. The Court held that the petitioners had previously litigated the same issues and obtained no relief, and the PIL was filed after substantial construction had already been completed.

The Altamount Road Area Citizens Committee and another petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms Fair Compensation for Land Acquisition in Akola District. Judgments ensure balanced development needs and individual rights amidst 'Blue Zone' classification disputes.

Acquisition of land in Akola District, Maharashtra, under the MRTP Act. The core issues revolve around the classification of land as 'Blue Zone' and t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

State Government’s Shift of Sports Complex to Rural Area Quashed. Court Orders CIDCO to Revert Land for Sports Complex Development, Emphasizing Public Interest and Transparency

The State Government's decision to relocate the Government Sports Complex from Navi Mumbai to a rural area for commercial exploitation has been critic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Quashes State Decision to Shift Navi Mumbai Sports Complex, Reaffirms Public Interest. Judgment emphasizes the importance of accessible sports facilities, criticizes arbitrary land reallocation for commercial use, and mandates CIDCO to hand over land for the original sports complex.

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenges the allocation of land originally designate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds BBMP Circular Requiring NOC for Building Plan Sanction on Sites Formed Prior to 1965. Circular dated 29.02.2016 held valid under Section 321 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 and Article 300-A of Constitution of India.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging a circular dated 29.02.2016 issued by the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). The c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Garden and Playground in Development Plan. Land Reserved Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Delay or Change of Purpose Once Acquisition Proceedings Are Initiated.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Abhijit Chandrakant Chaunda and Chandrashekhar Mallikarjunappa Bidve challenging the acquisition of ...