Search Results for "Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules"

70 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Clarifies Powers of Collector under Section 142 of Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. Court Expands the Scope of "Any Place" in Section 142(1) to Include Multiple Licensed Shops in the Interest of Public Peace.

The Bombay High Court addressed the scope of the Collector's powers under Section 142(1) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The petitioners cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material and No Failure to Disclose. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as Revenue Failed to Allege Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It had entered into a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for AY 2007-2008. Failure to Assess Consideration Under Distribution Agreement Constitutes Income Escaping Assessment.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It entered into a Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Excise Licence Case — Policy Restriction on Multiple FLII Licences Upheld. Refusal to Renew Second Foreign Liquor Licence Under Section 137(2) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, Upheld as Consistent with Government Policy and Not Discriminatory.

The appellant, Nandkishor Shivprasad Jaiswal, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment of a Single Judge dismissing his Writ Petition No. 16...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking to Restrain CIDCO from Enforcing Contractual Stipulation. Writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked to prevent a party to an agreement from insisting upon a contractual term.

The petitioner, M/s G.D.C. Buildcon Pvt Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Licensee's Challenge to Arrears Demand and License Lapse in Bombay Prohibition Act Case. Demand for License Fee Arrears for Period Prior to License Grant Held Unenforceable and License Cannot Lapse Without Notice.

The petitioner, Suresh Krishnaji Lakudkar, held a CLIII license under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, for the sale of foreign liquor. In Writ Petiti...