Search Results for "Banking Companies"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Banking Companies"

742 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 742 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up of S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. for Inability to Pay Debts. Multiple financial creditors and operational creditors successfully proved the company's insolvency under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

1 Jul 2016

The judgment concerns a batch of company petitions filed by various financial creditors and operational creditors seeking the winding up of S. Kumars ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in MPID Act Case — Intercorporate Deposits Not Covered Under MPID Act. Loan advanced by one company to another company registered under Companies Act, 1956 does not constitute a 'deposit' under Section 2(c) of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Ashish Mahendrakar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal P...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses MSME Appeals Holding Restructuring Notification Directory. Banks/NBFCs Not Obliged to Restructure MSME Accounts Suo Moto Under Section 9 MSMED Act Before SARFAESI Action.

1 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by MSMEs challenging the Bombay High Court's order that Banks/NBFCs are not obliged to adopt the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal by Union Bank of India in Banking Ombudsman Award Enforcement Case. Court Upholds Single Judge Order Directing Reconsideration of One-Time Settlement Proposal, Holding Banking Ombudsman Award Binding Under Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2006 and Section 35A Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

16 Oct 2025

The case involves a dispute between Union Bank of India (appellant) and M/s NHDPL South Private Limited (respondent/borrower) regarding the bank's ref...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ of Prohibition Against Securitization Application Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Establish Lack of Jurisdiction as Respondent Was a Secured Creditor Under Section 2(1)(zd) of the Act. The court held that the challenge to the maintainability of the application under Section 14 was premature and that the petitioner could raise all contentions before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate.

21 Feb 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Pyramid Developers, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, filed a writ petition under Articles 22...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Banking Ombudsman Award for Wrongful Debit Despite Stop Payment Instructions. Bank's Liability Upheld as Limitation Period Under Banking Ombudsman Scheme 1995 is Directory, Not Mandatory.

10 Jun 2010

The case involves a dispute between Canara Bank (the petitioner) and Shri Uttam Rathod (respondent no.1), a proprietor of M/s. Rishi Impex, who held a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Banking Ombudsman Order in Demand Draft Cancellation Dispute. Petitioner Entitled to Cancellation of DD and Credit of Amount with Interest as RBI Circulars Permit Cancellation After Three Months and Complaint Was Within Limitation.

25 Nov 2024

The petitioner, Doddaballapur Spinning Mills, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, held a current account with ICICI Bank Ltd. (respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows HDFC Bank's Petition Against DRAT Remand Order in Debt Recovery Dispute. Court holds that DRAT failed to exercise jurisdiction by remanding the matter to DRT without deciding the issue of whether HDFC's claim constitutes a 'debt' under Section 2(g) of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.

20 Feb 2025

The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions arising from a common order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 26 April 2024. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition for Commission on Guarantees Issued to Court — Canara Bank Entitled to 3% Commission on Guarantees in Favour of Prothonotary and Senior Master. The court held that a bank issuing guarantees at the request of a customer is entitled to commission as per its standard terms, and the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal erred in denying such commission.

6 May 2014

The petitioner, Canara Bank, a body corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, filed a wr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging RBI Circular on Resolution of Stressed Assets. Circular dated 12.02.2018 held to be valid and within RBI's powers under Sections 35A and 35AB of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

8 Mar 2018

The petitioners, Jayaswal Neco Industries Limited and Jayaswal Holdings Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)