Search Results for "BIR Act"

163 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 163 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Contract Labour Dispute. Court Upholds Industrial Court's Power to Entertain Complaint for Direct Employment and Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Raymond Ltd. challenging the jurisdiction of the Industrial Court to entertain complaints filed by c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in Air India Ltd. — Probationers Have No Right to Be Confirmed and Termination Without Stigma Is Valid.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Jeetendra Krishna Varma (WP 875/2011) and Mayank Mohan Sharma (WP 1427/2015) against Air India Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. Employer Failed to Prove Voluntary Abandonment of Service; Termination Without Specific Order Held Illegal.

The petitioner, M/s. Empire Dyeing, a textile processing company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Order Declaring Transfer of Employees as Illegal Change Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act. Transfer from Polyester Department to Spurn Yarn Department Without Notice of Change Violates Section 42 Read with Schedule II Items 1,2,4,5 of BIR Act.

The petitioner, Indorama Synthetics (I) Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 5 December 2006 passed by the Labour Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Intervention in Industrial Dispute. Petitioners Not Necessary Parties Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Empress Mills, a unit of Maharashtra State Textile Corporation Limited, challenging orders passed in B.I...