Search Results for "BDA layout"

93 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 93 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Encroachment on B-Kharab Land: Key Judgment Every Property Owner Must Know.

The writ petitions were filed challenging action of BBMP alleging construction over a storm water drain and seeking protection from demolition –...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for Suppression of Material Facts in Land Acquisition Dispute. Writ petitioner must disclose all relevant facts including prior civil suit and appeal; failure to do so disentitles equitable relief under Article 226.

The case involves an appeal by the sons of M. Krishna Reddy against the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) and others. The appellants claimed that ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Scheme Under Section 27 of BDA Act. Scheme Declared Lapsed Due to Non-Completion Within Time Limit.

The petitioner, Sri. S. Kaleel, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the J.P. Nagar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Acquisition Proceedings Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation for Land at Thippasandra Village.

The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) appealed against an order of a learned Single Judge which held that the acquisition proceedings in respect o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging BDA Site Allotments Due to Lack of Standing and Delay. Petitioner failed to establish title or locus standi to challenge allotments made to respondents 3 to 6 in 2003-2009.

The petitioner, Wajid Pasha, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Banga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows BDA Appeal, Sets Aside Interim Status Quo Order in Land Acquisition Dispute. Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Acquired Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Plaintiff's Sale Deeds After Acquisition Confer No Title or Lawful Possession.

The appeal by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) arose from an interim order passed by the City Civil Court in OS 7025/2012, which directed mai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to BDA Scheme Non-Lapse and Government's Withdrawal Notification. Scheme Under BDA Act Does Not Lapse Automatically Under Section 27; Government's Power to Withdraw from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld.

The petitioner, Sri H. Krishna Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the 'By...