Search Results for "Article 370"

176 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 176 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Dramatic Performance Licence in Tamasha Case — District Magistrate Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 33 of Bombay Police Act, 1951. Licence Cancellation for Alleged Obscenity Set Aside as Magistrate Failed to Apply Mind and Acted on Extraneous Considerations.

The petitioner, Renuka Loknatya Tamasa Mandal, a cultural organization engaged in Tamasha performances, held a licence under Section 33 of the Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking to Restrain Ministers from Exercising President's Constitutional Powers. Court holds that the President exercises executive powers on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers under Article 74 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, P.B. Samant, claiming to be an active social worker, filed a public interest litigation in the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demolition of Residential Structures Without Notice Under Gujarat Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 2012. Demolition Without Prior Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Article 300A of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Kureshi Irfanbhai Mohammadsharifbhai and others, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SFC Petition Against Guarantors Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act, 1951 — Guarantors Liable Despite Company's Winding Up. Guarantee is a separate contract and liability of guarantor is co-extensive with principal debtor under Section 128 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a State Financial Corporation, filed a petition under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Goa Children's Act, 2003 as Premature. Petitioner Convicted for Kidnapping and Murder of Minor Cannot Challenge State Legislation When Appeal Against Conviction is Pending.

The petitioner, Rohan Pradeep Dhungat, was convicted by the Goa Children's Court in Special Case No.28/2006 for offences including kidnapping for rans...