Search Results for "Article 164"

721 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 721 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Notification and Order for Removal of Obstructions — Violation of Natural Justice. Order Under Section 16(1) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 Quashed as Petitioners Were Not Heard.

The petitioners, Dalwadi Pramodkumar Dayarambhai and others, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging a notification published ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Overrules PV Narasimha Rao, Holds Bribery Not Protected by Parliamentary Privilege — Legislators Who Accept Bribes for Speech or Vote Are Not Immune from Prosecution Under Articles 105(2) and 194(2) of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court of India, in a seven-judge bench decision, overruled its earlier majority judgment in PV Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE) (1998) 4 S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Section 164(2)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 and Press Note Dated 6.9.2017 — Directors of Private Limited Companies Cannot Be Exempted from Disqualification for Non-Filing of Financial Statements.

The petitioners, Mr. Yenugu Krishna Murthy, Mr. Devarunda Manjegowda Purnesh, and Mr. Manjunath Krishnarajanagar Manikyam, filed three writ petitions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Section 164(2)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 and Press Note Dated 6.9.2017 — Directors of Private Limited Companies Cannot Be Exempted from Disqualification for Non-Filing of Financial Statements.

The petitioners, Mr. Yenugu Krishna Murthy, Mr. Devarunda Manjegowda Purnesh, and Mr. Manjunath Krishnarajanagar Manikyam, filed three writ petitions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Questions on Eligibility of Judicial Officers for Direct Recruitment as District Judges to Constitution Bench — Interpretation of Article 233(2) of Constitution of India, 1950 Regarding Requirement of Continuous Practice as Advocate.

The Supreme Court, in a reference by a three-Judge Bench, examined substantial questions of law concerning the interpretation of Article 233(2) of the...