Search Results for "Appellate Arbitral Tribunal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Appellate Arbitral Tribunal"

694 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 694 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Issue of Accord and Satisfaction to be Decided by Arbitrator Under Section 11(6A) of Arbitration Act, 1996. The Court held that the High Court erred in refusing appointment on ground of full and final settlement, as the limited jurisdiction under Section 11(6A) only permits examination of existence of arbitration agreement.

5 May 2023

The appellant, M/s. Shree Vishnu Constructions, entered into an agreement with the respondents (Military Engineering Service) on 22.07.2010 for constr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Termination of Contract. Court holds that existence of disputes and arbitration agreement is sufficient for appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, even if the underlying contract is terminated.

30 Nov 2023

The appellant, Madgavkar Salvage, a partnership firm, filed an appeal against the order of the Commercial Court rejecting its application under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Sub-Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Appellate Bench Decision of Bombay Stock Exchange. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitral tribunal and appellate bench are not liable to be interfered with under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

9 Oct 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Actal, a sole proprietorship concern engaged in trading in shares, insurance, bonds, mutual funds, etc., was associated with the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Arbitrator's failure to consider vital evidence and crucial documents renders award patently illegal and liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Nov 2025

The appellant, M/s Leaf Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an order of the Ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award That Declared Termination of Master Asset Purchase Agreement by Repudiation. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Scope of Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

30 Jan 2023

The appeal arises from a dispute between V Hotels Ltd (appellant) and Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt Ltd (respondent no. 1) concerning a Master Asset Purc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Non-Delivery of Shares and Limitation Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Law.

4 May 2021

The appellant, M/s Satish K. Narang & Co., an investor, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Transaction Dispute — No Perversity or Wednesbury Unreasonableness Found. The Court held that a new argument not raised before the arbitrator or in Section 34 proceedings cannot be raised for the first time in a Section 37 appeal.

15 Apr 2024

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by SATCO Capital Markets Ltd. against Rahul H Bajaj....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Remand Order for Further Evidence Upheld. Court holds that appellate arbitral tribunal's directions for further evidence are within its powers and do not constitute a final determination of rights under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Dec 2014

The case involves a dispute between ANS Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner), a registered stock broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange, and Mr. Jayesh R. Ajmera (resp...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Enforcement Case — Upholds Arbitral Award Despite Conflicting Jurisdiction Clauses. Court Holds That Where Multiple Agreements Contain Different Arbitration Clauses, a Common Arbitrator Can Be Appointed with Consent, and the Award Is Not Liable to Be Set Aside Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2020

The dispute arose between Quippo Construction Equipment Ltd. (appellant) and Janardan Nirman Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) concerning four agreements for hir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Finding That Trades Were Authorized by Client. Court holds that under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the arbitral award is not patently illegal or perverse and does not warrant interference.

17 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Sharma, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dat...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)