Search Results for "Age proof"

4066 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4066 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Age Determination. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC set aside as victim's age not proved beyond reasonable doubt and medical evidence inconsistent with alleged rape.

The appellant, Manikanta @ Puli, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Chikkamagaluru, in Spl.C.(PCSOA) No.10/2017 for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence on Age of Victim. Consent of Victim Above 16 Years Renders Sexual Intercourse Not Rape Under Section 376 IPC.

The appellant, Ashok Pande, was convicted under Section 376 IPC for rape of a minor girl, Latiba (PW2), and sentenced to seven years rigorous imprison...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Minor Cricketer's Petition Challenging Age Determination Test Report. The court quashed the TW-3 test report and directed BCCI and MCA to consider documentary evidence for age verification.

The petitioner, Master Sagar Prakash Chhabria, a minor represented by his father, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Conviction Under Section 6 of POCSO Act for Failure to Prove Victim's Minority. Non-Production of School Birth Certificate Renders Ossification Test Insufficient Under Mandatory Age Determination Procedure.

Background: The present appeal arose from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, in Special Case (POCSO) No.61/2016, whereby the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Consensual Relationship. Victim's Age Not Proved Below 18, and Sexual Intercourse Was Consensual, Leading to Acquittal Under Sections 363, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Yadav Chandoba Dawlekar, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge-4, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.19 of 2015 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.466 OF 2016

The appeal was filed before the Bombay High Court against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, convicting the appellant under Sect...