Search Results for "AAIFR order"

36 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 36 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Company Law Board Order — Transfer of Shares After BIFR Recommendation Void Under Section 536(2) Companies Act, 1956. Winding Up Deemed to Commence from Date of BIFR Recommendation Under Section 441(2) Companies Act, 1956.

The appellants, Maharashtra Antibiotics and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (MAPL) and Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd., challenged an order of the Company Law Board (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Leave to Execute Consent Decree in Company Liquidation. Consent Decree Declared Void as Fraudulent Preference Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the Company Judge refusing leave under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 to the appellant, Forbes & Company Lim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.

The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up of S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. for Inability to Pay Debts. Multiple financial creditors and operational creditors successfully proved the company's insolvency under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns a batch of company petitions filed by various financial creditors and operational creditors seeking the winding up of S. Kumars ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitration Matter — Consent Order Not Stayed as No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court held that a consent order passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be stayed unless fraud or lack of jurisdiction is shown.

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Limited, a non-banking finance company, had sanctioned an invoice discounting facility of Rs. 20,00,00...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Order Allowing Workmen's Application for Payment of Gratuity and Other Dues from Company Assets. Workmen's dues have priority under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956, and Official Liquidator must pay from sale proceeds.

The case involves two appeals filed by Grand View Estates Private Limited and Forbes & Company Limited against an order of the Company Court allowing ...