Search Results for "witness restriction"

684 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 684 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Alleging Deceptive Similarity in Beer Trade Marks. Plaintiff Claims 'Hercules Black Label' Infringes 'Kalyani Black Label'.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard an appeal filed by United Breweries Ltd (plaintiff) against the judgment and decree of the XXV Addition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Seeking Pay Scales as per Government Notification. Industrial Court's finding that the Government Notification dated 27.07.1989 was not applicable to the complainants and that the settlement at Exh. 48 governed their pay scales was upheld.

The petitioner, a trade union of non-teaching employees of Ramdeobaba Kamla Nehru Engineering College, filed a complaint under the MRTU & PULP Act all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Compensation in Land Acquisition References for MSRTC Bus Depot at Dahisar, Borivali. Comparable Land Sale Instances Analyzed to Fix Market Value Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

This matter involved a group of land acquisition references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by land owners whose properties ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Businessman with 50% Disability. Compensation enhanced from Rs. 3,50,000 to Rs. 9,27,000 by applying correct multiplier of 18, adding future prospects, and not deducting personal expenses.

The appellant, Ramchand Kishnani, a businessman aged 42, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Partially Allows Appeal by Pune Municipal Corporation in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. The Court held that the deceased was 50% contributory negligent for the accident, modifying the Tribunal's 25% deduction.

The Pune Municipal Corporation appealed against the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Pune, in Claim Petition No.581 of 2014, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Rejection of Petition Under Section 163A MV Act — Claimants Entitled to Compensation as Per Structured Formula Despite Alleged Contributory Negligence.

The appellants, Ashabai, Seema, and Umesh, are the legal representatives of the deceased Kalyan Kothi. They filed a claim petition under Section 163A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows VIDC Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Compensation Reduced from Rs.2,00,000 to Rs.1,00,000 per Hectare. Market Value Determined Based on Sale Deed of Similar Land with 10% Deduction for Development Charges.

The case pertains to a land acquisition dispute where the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC) appealed against the enhancement of compe...