KAHC010069912016_1
10 Nov 2016...
Search Results for "water supply contract"
613 result(s) found
Found 613 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds NGT Decision Quashing Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances Under EIA Notification 1994. Circular dated 14 May 2002 Allowing Retrospective Clearances Held Invalid as Prior Environmental Clearance is Mandatory Under Section 3 of Environment Protection Act 1986.
1 Apr 2020The case involves appeals against the judgment of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dated 8 January 2016, which quashed a circular issued by the Union...
- 288
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.
10 Nov 2016The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...
- 96
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Arbitral Award on Repairs and Interest. The court upheld the Single Judge's order setting aside findings on repairs as perverse and reduced interest rate from 18% to 9% per annum.
18 Aug 2022The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Interocean Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd against an order of the le...
- 84
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Clarification and Declares CGST Rule 31A(3) Ultra Vires in Favor of Turf Clubs. GST Liability on Betting Amount Limited to Commission Retained, Not Entire Totalisator Collection, Under CGST Act, 2017.
2 Jun 2021The two writ petitions were filed by Bangalore Turf Club Limited and Mysore Race Club Limited, companies conducting horse racing and facilitating bett...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Review and Rectification Orders in MVAT Case Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's claim for deduction under Rule 58 of MVAT Rules for works contract was wrongly rejected by review order passed beyond limitation period and without proper hearing.
3 Aug 2023The petitioner, Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd., challenged a review order dated 8th March 2021 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax under...
- 49
High Court
Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.
10 Nov 2016The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suit for Cargo Damage Claim Due to Lack of In Rem Jurisdiction and Limitation Bar. The court held that the vessel was not within Indian territorial waters at the time of suit filing and the claim was time-barred under the one-year limitation period under Article III Rule 6 of the Hague Rules.
28 Aug 2019The plaintiff, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, filed an admiralty suit in rem against the vessel 'Rickmers Dubai' and other defendants for recover...
- 134
High Court
- 74
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Demolition of Illegal Structures in CRZ Area. Petitioners failed to establish legal right to retain unauthorized constructions violating CRZ Notification 2011 and Environment Protection Act, 1986.
28 Jul 2023The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by 30 individuals challenging the demolition of their structures by the Goa Coastal Zone Management ...
- 70
