Search Results for "tutored witnesses"

446 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 446 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Penetrative Sexual Assault Allegation Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Other Witnesses Under Section 5(l) r/w 6 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The appellant, Sundaram, was convicted by the Fast Track Mahila Court, Krishnagiri, for offences under Section 5(l) r/w 6 of the POCSO Act and Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Anna Sose, was convicted by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana in Sessions Trial No.89/1998 for an offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Rape of Minor Case Under POCSO Act — Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Found Credible. The court held that the delay in FIR was explained and the appellant's false implication theory was not supported by evidence.

The appellant, Samadhan Kashiram Khirodkar, was convicted by the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, in Sessions Trial No.92/2015 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals, Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case. Evidence of Child Witness and Circumstantial Evidence Proves Guilt Under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34, IPC.

The appeals challenged the conviction of two accused by the Sessions Court for murder and causing disappearance of evidence. The prosecution's case wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 342 and 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support forcible penetration.

The appellant, Vijay Prahlad Warankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon on 24 July 1998 for offences under Sections 342 (wrong...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. The court affirmed that the appellant's act of hitting the deceased's head against a wall with intent to cause death constituted murder under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Umesh Suresh Vale, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of Gautam Chandramani. The incid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Held Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Rajaram Banduke, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Gangubai. The prosecution case wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Failure to Prove Chain of Circumstances Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302 and 394 IPC Set Aside Due to Lack of Motive, Last Seen Evidence, and Recovery of Articles.

The appellant, Pramil @ Premanand Rao, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder and r...