Search Results for "summon witness"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "summon witness"

461 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Doubtful Seizure — Conviction for Possession of Ganja Set Aside as Search of Vehicle Without Personal Search of Accused Renders Trial Vitiated.

27 Sep 2006

The case involves two appeals by Madansingh Kamalsingh Rajput and Savairam Devla Jadhav against their conviction under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic D...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

10 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Conviction Due to Non-Compliance with Section 138 NI Act Requirements. The Court held that a time-barred debt is not a legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the accused successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139.

18 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Sushila Tupekar, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gangakhed, in SCC No.76/2013 for an offence under Section 138 o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Recovery of Business Premises — Conducting Agreement Not Proved as License; Relationship of Licensor-Licensee Not Established. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove the conducting agreement and the defendant's possession was adverse, barring the suit by limitation.

19 May 2020

The appellants (original defendants) challenged the judgment and decree dated 20th March 2007 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court, which decreed the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Negotiable Instruments Act Case - Holds Amended Provisions Apply Retrospectively to Pending Complaints. The court ruled that procedural amendments under the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002 apply to all pending complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, regardless of the date of filing.

21 Sep 2005

The case involves a Criminal Revision Application filed by M/s. Indraprastha Holdings Ltd., the complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Ne...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Declaration of Ownership by Adverse Possession Against Government Land. Claim of Long Possession Fails as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Possession for Over 12 Years and Property Was Government Land.

21 Oct 2010

The appellants, plaintiffs in the original suit, filed First Appeal No. 282 of 2007 before the Bombay High Court at Goa against the judgment dated 25-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Permanent Lok Adalat's Jurisdiction in Service Dispute. The Court held that the dispute concerning recovery of excess payment from pension and gratuity of a retired employee of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran relates to a public utility service under Section 22A(b) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and the Permanent Lok Adalat has jurisdiction.

10 Aug 2022

The Petitioner, the Chief Administrative Officer of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 29 June 2019 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Specification of Period — Blanket Order Invalid Under Section 3(2) Proviso. The court held that the proviso to Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 mandates specification of detention period in the order, and a blanket order without such specification is invalid.

23 Feb 2021

The petitioner, Sadashiv s/o Shriram Jadhav, challenged the legality and correctness of a detention order dated 18.9.2020 passed by the Collector and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Goa Children's Act, 2003 as Premature. Petitioner Convicted for Kidnapping and Murder of Minor Cannot Challenge State Legislation When Appeal Against Conviction is Pending.

6 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Rohan Pradeep Dhungat, was convicted by the Goa Children's Court in Special Case No.28/2006 for offences including kidnapping for rans...

27 28 29 30 31

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)