Search Results for "stock witness"

446 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 446 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Permanent Disability and Loss of Earning Capacity. Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 1,50,000 to Rs. 3,00,000 Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Severe Injuries Sustained by Rider of Luna Moped.

The appellant, Kishor Thaokar, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a motor vehic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Radha @ Ashtha Vitthal Takaras, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, for the murder of three-year-old Payal and f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two police constables, Ghalappa Sardar Nadgeri (Appellant No.1) and Gurunath Keshav Rathod (A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's account was inconsistent and lacked corroboration, leading to benefit of doubt.

The appellant, Deepak Pralhad Shejwal, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Sham Gade and sentenced to life impr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Mixing and Sampling from Bulk Container Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused Suryabhan Ukarda Rokade for offences under the Prevention of Food Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Police Assault Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 332 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Chhalasingh s/o Kishansing Chavan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Basmathnagar, for an offence under Section 332 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Reinstatement with 50% Back Wages for Illegal Termination. Services Rendered at Different Units of Same Employer Counted Together for Computing 240 Days Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited, challenged an award of the First Labour Court, Nagpur, which directed reinstatemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Principles of Natural Justice in Steel Allotment Cancellation Inquiry under Essential Commodities Act. Controller's Refusal to Record Oral Evidence and Definition of Error Apparent on Face of Award Scrutinized.

The dispute arose from the appellant company's need for steel sheets to manufacture barrels. Under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and the Iron a...