Search Results for "statutory arbitration agreement"

976 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 976 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order on Jurisdiction in Arbitration Claim Petition. Court holds that Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides a remedy against an arbitral award, not an interlocutory order, and that the petition is premature.

The petitioner, a cooperative housing society, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 14th Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Central Warehousing Corporation Against Appointment of Arbitrator — Public Premises Act Does Not Override Arbitration Act. Disputes Over Unilateral Rate Revision and Lease Renewal Are Arbitrable Under Clause 16 of the Lease Agreement.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by the Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) against a High Court order appointing an arbitrator to resolve disp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to MSME Facilitation Council Awards Against National Textile Corporation. Awards Upheld as Facilitation Council Had Jurisdiction Under MSMED Act and Awards Not Patently Illegal.

The petitioner, National Textile Corporation Ltd., filed two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Housing Board Against High Court Order Directing Arbitration Tribunal to Entertain Fresh Claim Despite Prior Arbitral Award. Principle of Issue Estoppel and Finality of Award Under Arbitration Act, 1996 Applied.

The case involves three civil appeals by the Madhya Pradesh Housing and Infrastructure Development Board against a common judgment of the Madhya Prade...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Referral to Arbitration in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement of Sale Contains Valid Arbitration Clause. Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates referral when arbitration agreement exists and subject matter is arbitrable.

The Petitioner, Suman Baburao Thapa, was the defendant in Special Civil Suit No.566 of 2011 filed by Respondent Nos.1 and 2 (Jigar K. Mehta and Anand ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Maritime Board Dispute Over Cargo Handling Charges. Court sets aside majority award directing payment at Rs.3 per metric tonne, remits matter for fresh consideration on applicability of 1995 or 1996 policy.

The Maharashtra Maritime Board (Claimant) filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Prior Award Being Set Aside — Arbitration Clause Survives. The court held that the setting aside of an award does not render the arbitration clause inoperative under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, M/s. Associated Constructions, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Co-defendant in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Deletion of Party Ordered Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Co-defendant Against Whom No Relief Claimed is Not a Necessary Party.

The case involves two civil revision applications arising from a suit filed by Vidharbha Enterprises (plaintiff) against the Union of India and BSNL (...